Hum, good idea for the very first try. We should try this out this week.
But I still want a normal TCXO/OCXO replacement for UmTRX to make it
easier to rework more UmTRX boards.
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:35 AM, sergey kostanbaev
<sergey.kostanbaev(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Just use our ClockTamer to see how it works :)
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Alexander Chemeris
<alexander.chemeris(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Robin,
>
> Do you mean to use ADF4002 to double the frequency?
>
> Right now I want a simple solution - just replace the TCXO on UmTRX
> from 26MHz to 61.44MHz and see how it works. Doubling the frequency
> would require PCB rework and is possible for the next generation of
> UmTRX only.
>
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Robin Coxe <coxe(a)close-haul.com> wrote:
>>
>> Something like the attached Taiten VCTCXO @ 30.72 MHz + ADF4002 Phase
>> Detector/PLL synthesizer might work. I have no idea how much the
>> oscillator
>> costs. (The Pletronics oscillator on the UmTRX and the GAPfiller
>> GSM900
>> isn't available at this frequency.)
>>
>>
>>
>>
http://www.analog.com/en/rfif-components/pll-synthesizersvcos/adf4002/produ…
>>
>> -Robin
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Alexander Chemeris
>> <alexander.chemeris(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> John,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:24 AM, John Orlando
>>> <john(a)epiqsolutions.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Alexander Chemeris
>>>> <alexander.chemeris(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:11 PM, John Orlando
>>>>> <john(a)epiqsolutions.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Alexander Chemeris
>>>>>> <alexander.chemeris(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Srdjan,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We're looking into re-purposing UmTRX for LTE and there a
few
>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>> we need to understand better.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. Is it possible to support 15MHz and 20MHz LTE channel
>>>>>>> bandwidths?
>>>>>>> To
>>>>>>> achieve this we at least need to sample at 23.04Msps and
30.72Msps
>>>>>>> respectively. LMS6002D datasheet specifies the maximum I/Q
>>>>>>> samplerate
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> 14Msps, which is not enough. But at the same time, datasheet
>>>>>>> claims
>>>>>>> that ADC
>>>>>>> and DAC are specified up to 50Msps. How does this fits
together?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alexander,
>>>>>> Can you provide a reference to where the datasheet calls out a
max
>>>>>> I/Q
>>>>>> sample rate of 14 Msps? The analog low pass filters support a
max
>>>>>> bandwidth of 14 MHz (which leads to 28 MHz RF bandwidth assuming
>>>>>> zero-IF operation)...is this what you're referencing?
>>>>>
>>>>> The datasheet is not very clear on this topic. I'm referring to
the
>>>>> following line at the Table 1:
>>>>> Baseband Bandwidth 14MHz
>>>>>
>>>>> Originally I read this line as "digital I/Q bus has limitation
of
>>>>> 14Msps" and this is what confuses me.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, this refers to the analog baseband filter bandwidth.
>>>
>>> Ok, thanks for the clarification.
>>>
>>>>>> We run the A/D
>>>>>> converters in the LMS6002d at sample rates greater than 14 Msps
all
>>>>>> the time, including 30.72 Msps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just to be sure - do you mean you feed RX_CLK and TX_CLK of LMS6002D
>>>>> with 61.44MHz clock? It's divided by 2 internally, so if you
feed
>>>>> them
>>>>> with 30.72MHz clock you actually get only 15.36Msps out of LMS6002D.
>>>>
>>>> Correct, when running the A/D at 30.72 Msps, the RX_CLK signal needs
>>>> to run at 61.44 MHz.
>>>
>>> Great!
>>> In case you know a good 61.44 MHz oscillator with a reasonable price -
>>> I would appreciate a pointer.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Alexander Chemeris.
>>> CEO, Fairwaves LLC / ООО УмРадио
>>>
http://fairwaves.ru
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Robin Coxe | Close-Haul Communications, Inc. | Boston, MA
>> +1-617-470-8825
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Alexander Chemeris.
> CEO, Fairwaves LLC / ООО УмРадио
>
http://fairwaves.ru
>