December 2025 - gerrit-log - lists.osmocom.org

[XS] Change in libosmocore[master]: gsm/rsl: add definition for TFO transparent container IE
by falconia 15 Dec '25

15 Dec '25

falconia has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/41668?usp=email ) Change subject: gsm/rsl: add definition for TFO transparent container IE ...................................................................... gsm/rsl: add definition for TFO transparent container IE 3GPP Rel5 version of TS 48.058 RSL spec introduced a new IE named "TFO transparent container". By this point in GSM/3GPP evolutionary history, Abis was already treated as a de facto proprietary interface, and the spec is silent regarding the exact bit content of this new IE. (See vague description in section 9.3.59.) However, this IE was added at the same time as Generic Config Frames for TFO (TS 28.062 Annex H), hence one can reasonably infer that this IE is intended to transport the content of these GCFs between the BTS and the BSC, with the BTS relaying, mostly transparently, between the BSC and the TRAU channel. Add RSL_IE_TFO_XPAR_CONT definition, to make it possible to add this IE to CHAN ACTIV and MODE MODIFY commands (and thus enable TFO-AMR on those E1 BTS models that implement Rel5 version thereof) and to parse BTS response and notification messages that may also contain this IE. Change-Id: Ic6839827fb2bf8e401476af1d7907b577e5f094d --- M include/osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_08_58.h M src/gsm/rsl.c 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Approvals: fixeria: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve pespin: Looks good to me, approved Jenkins Builder: Verified laforge: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve diff --git a/include/osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_08_58.h b/include/osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_08_58.h index 13e84ba..fe41237 100644 --- a/include/osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_08_58.h +++ b/include/osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_08_58.h @@ -358,6 +358,7 @@ RSL_IE_RTD, RSL_IE_TFO_STATUS, RSL_IE_LLP_APDU, + RSL_IE_TFO_XPAR_CONT, /* Siemens vendor-specific */ RSL_IE_SIEMENS_MRPCI = 0x40, RSL_IE_SIEMENS_PREF_AREA_TYPE = 0x43, diff --git a/src/gsm/rsl.c b/src/gsm/rsl.c index c7d69a1..b394a34 100644 --- a/src/gsm/rsl.c +++ b/src/gsm/rsl.c @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ [RSL_IE_RTD] = { TLV_TYPE_TV }, [RSL_IE_TFO_STATUS] = { TLV_TYPE_TV }, [RSL_IE_LLP_APDU] = { TLV_TYPE_TLV }, + [RSL_IE_TFO_XPAR_CONT] = { TLV_TYPE_TLV }, [RSL_IE_SIEMENS_MRPCI] = { TLV_TYPE_TV }, [RSL_IE_OSMO_REP_ACCH_CAP] = { TLV_TYPE_TLV }, [RSL_IE_OSMO_TRAINING_SEQUENCE] = { TLV_TYPE_TLV }, -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/41668?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: merged Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic6839827fb2bf8e401476af1d7907b577e5f094d Gerrit-Change-Number: 41668 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[XS] Change in pysim[master]: setup.py: Align cmd2 minimum version with requirements.txt
by laforge 15 Dec '25

15 Dec '25

Attention is currently required from: dexter, fixeria, neels, osmith. laforge has posted comments on this change by laforge. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41642?usp=email ) Change subject: setup.py: Align cmd2 minimum version with requirements.txt ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) Patchset: PS1: > I'm fine with raising the minimum version. well, actually after some more thought, option 2 sounds like it causes less problems for users, so let's do that. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41642?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I71cee0ec3ed2abec68ec567beaab13c868721dad Gerrit-Change-Number: 41642 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 16:44:42 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[XS] Change in pysim[master]: setup.py: Align cmd2 minimum version with requirements.txt
by laforge 15 Dec '25

15 Dec '25

Attention is currently required from: dexter, fixeria, neels, osmith. laforge has posted comments on this change by laforge. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41642?usp=email ) Change subject: setup.py: Align cmd2 minimum version with requirements.txt ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) Patchset: PS1: > Good points. I think we need to figure out which versions of cmd2 we want to support. We could do e. […] I'm fine with raising the minimum version. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41642?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I71cee0ec3ed2abec68ec567beaab13c868721dad Gerrit-Change-Number: 41642 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 16:43:40 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[S] Change in libosmocore[master]: io_uring: RECVMSG_SENDMSG: Reset fd to blocking after osmo_fd_registe...
by pespin 15 Dec '25

15 Dec '25

Attention is currently required from: daniel, fixeria, jolly, laforge, osmith, pespin. Hello Jenkins Builder, daniel, fixeria, jolly, laforge, osmith, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/41671?usp=email to look at the new patch set (#2). The following approvals got outdated and were removed: Code-Review+1 by laforge, Verified-1 by Jenkins Builder Change subject: io_uring: RECVMSG_SENDMSG: Reset fd to blocking after osmo_fd_register() workaround ...................................................................... io_uring: RECVMSG_SENDMSG: Reset fd to blocking after osmo_fd_register() workaround When IOFD_FLAG_NOTIFY_CONNECTED is requested by the user through osmo_iofd_notify_connected(), a write_cb(0, NULL) callback is done towards the user to notify the socket is connected. In mode RECVMSG_SENDMSG, at least for SCTP sockets, according to comment in iofd_uring_register() (see also OS#5751) we cannot do the write(0) trick to get notifications, so instead we need to workaround by using a temporary osmo_fd to poll() for write status. To do so, we call osmo_fd_register(), which internally sets the fd as non-blocking (O_NONBLOCK). However, this is becomes an undesired behavior later on when connect happens and io_uring is used to recvmsg/sendmsg, since that could cause sqes to be answered with -EAGAIN cqes at the kernel isntead of keeping (blocking) them internally until the transaction can be resolved. This seems was a "desired" or "expected" behavior in older kernels according to public discussions/tickets, but it seeems it changed over time (see eg. GH#364 below). In summary, the conclusion seems to be: try to avoid as much as possible mixing O_NONBLOCK with io_uring, as you may get totally unexpected/changing behavior. Hence, avoid keeping O_NONBLOCK for those sockets when moving back from osmo_fd to io_uring. See regarding related discussion on the expected behavior with io_uring and O_NONBLOCK: https://www.spinics.net/lists/io-uring/msg04058.html https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/364 Change-Id: Idba623730230bc049b827e51b058cd64d23b730f --- M src/core/osmo_io_uring.c 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/libosmocore refs/changes/71/41671/2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/41671?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Idba623730230bc049b827e51b058cd64d23b730f Gerrit-Change-Number: 41671 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[S] Change in libosmo-netif[master]: cosmetic: stream_srv: srv_link: Document no need for OSMO_SOCK_F_NONB...
by pespin 15 Dec '25

15 Dec '25

Attention is currently required from: daniel, fixeria, jolly, laforge. Hello Jenkins Builder, daniel, fixeria, jolly, laforge, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/41666?usp=email to look at the new patch set (#5). The following approvals got outdated and were removed: Verified+1 by Jenkins Builder Change subject: cosmetic: stream_srv: srv_link: Document no need for OSMO_SOCK_F_NONBLOCK ...................................................................... cosmetic: stream_srv: srv_link: Document no need for OSMO_SOCK_F_NONBLOCK osmo_fd_register() currently takes care of setting the socket as non-blocking, before any blocking call is performed. Document it. If we ever switch from osmo_fd to io_uring to process the accept() op then we won't need to set the socket as nonblocking anyway, since io_uring expects to work with blocking sockets. Change-Id: I98a6ef55a0a7289b9eeb7e8062e9afa4d87f51eb --- M src/stream_srv.c 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/libosmo-netif refs/changes/66/41666/5 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/41666?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset Gerrit-Project: libosmo-netif Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I98a6ef55a0a7289b9eeb7e8062e9afa4d87f51eb Gerrit-Change-Number: 41666 Gerrit-PatchSet: 5 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[S] Change in libosmocore[master]: io_uring: RECVMSG_SENDMSG: Reset fd to blocking after osmo_fd_registe...
by laforge 15 Dec '25

15 Dec '25

Attention is currently required from: daniel, fixeria, jolly, osmith, pespin. laforge has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/41671?usp=email ) Change subject: io_uring: RECVMSG_SENDMSG: Reset fd to blocking after osmo_fd_register() workaround ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/41671?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Idba623730230bc049b827e51b058cd64d23b730f Gerrit-Change-Number: 41671 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 16:38:12 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes

1 0

[XS] Change in libosmocore[master]: cosmetic: io_uring: Fix typo in comment
by pespin 15 Dec '25

15 Dec '25

pespin has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/41670?usp=email ) Change subject: cosmetic: io_uring: Fix typo in comment ...................................................................... cosmetic: io_uring: Fix typo in comment Change-Id: I5ff1248e8aff1b55c65aecee4d1e2f5c0d5a48fb --- M src/core/osmo_io_uring.c 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Approvals: Jenkins Builder: Verified laforge: Looks good to me, approved diff --git a/src/core/osmo_io_uring.c b/src/core/osmo_io_uring.c index e4a87ad..cac6272 100644 --- a/src/core/osmo_io_uring.c +++ b/src/core/osmo_io_uring.c @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ /* OSMO_IO_FD_MODE_RECVMSG_SENDMSG: * Use a temporary osmo_fd which we can use to notify us once the connection is established * or failed (indicated by FD becoming writable). This is needed as (at least for SCTP sockets) - * one cannot submit a zero-length writev/sendmsg in order to get notification when the socekt + * one cannot submit a zero-length writev/sendmsg in order to get notification when the socket * is writable.*/ if (IOFD_FLAG_ISSET(iofd, IOFD_FLAG_NOTIFY_CONNECTED)) { osmo_fd_setup(&iofd->u.uring.connect_ofd, iofd->fd, OSMO_FD_WRITE, -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/41670?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: merged Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I5ff1248e8aff1b55c65aecee4d1e2f5c0d5a48fb Gerrit-Change-Number: 41670 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[XS] Change in libosmocore[master]: cosmetic: io_uring: Fix typo in comment
by laforge 15 Dec '25

15 Dec '25

Attention is currently required from: pespin. laforge has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/41670?usp=email ) Change subject: cosmetic: io_uring: Fix typo in comment ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/41670?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I5ff1248e8aff1b55c65aecee4d1e2f5c0d5a48fb Gerrit-Change-Number: 41670 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 16:36:54 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes

1 0

[XS] Change in pysim[master]: pySim.esim.saip: Fix compatibility with pytohn < 3.11
by laforge 15 Dec '25

15 Dec '25

laforge has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41669?usp=email ) Change subject: pySim.esim.saip: Fix compatibility with pytohn < 3.11 ...................................................................... pySim.esim.saip: Fix compatibility with pytohn < 3.11 In python up to 3.10, the byteorder argument of the int.to_bytes() method was mandatory, even if the length of the target byte sequence is 1 and there factually is no byteorder. https://docs.python.org/3.10/library/stdtypes.html#int.to_bytes vs https://docs.python.org/3.11/library/stdtypes.html#int.to_bytes See also: https://discourse.osmocom.org/t/assistance-required-with-saip-pysim-tool-er… Change-Id: I8ba29d42c8d7bf0a36772cc3370eff1f6afa879f --- M pySim/esim/saip/__init__.py 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Approvals: fixeria: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve laforge: Looks good to me, approved Jenkins Builder: Verified diff --git a/pySim/esim/saip/__init__.py b/pySim/esim/saip/__init__.py index c7f3e75..1c0c715 100644 --- a/pySim/esim/saip/__init__.py +++ b/pySim/esim/saip/__init__.py @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ self.file_type = template.file_type self.fid = template.fid self.sfi = template.sfi - self.arr = template.arr.to_bytes(1) + self.arr = template.arr.to_bytes(1, 'big') if hasattr(template, 'rec_len'): self.rec_len = template.rec_len else: @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ fileDescriptor['shortEFID'] = bytes([self.sfi]) if self.df_name: fileDescriptor['dfName'] = self.df_name - if self.arr and self.arr != self.template.arr.to_bytes(1): + if self.arr and self.arr != self.template.arr.to_bytes(1, 'big'): fileDescriptor['securityAttributesReferenced'] = self.arr if self.file_type in ['LF', 'CY']: fdb_dec['file_type'] = 'working_ef' @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ if self.read_and_update_when_deact: spfi |= 0x40 # TS 102 222 Table 5 if spfi != 0x00: - pefi['specialFileInformation'] = spfi.to_bytes(1) + pefi['specialFileInformation'] = spfi.to_bytes(1, 'big') if self.fill_pattern: if not self.fill_pattern_repeat: pefi['fillPattern'] = self.fill_pattern -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41669?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: merged Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I8ba29d42c8d7bf0a36772cc3370eff1f6afa879f Gerrit-Change-Number: 41669 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>

1 0

[XS] Change in pysim[master]: pySim.esim.saip: Fix compatibility with pytohn < 3.11
by laforge 15 Dec '25

15 Dec '25

Attention is currently required from: dexter, lynxis lazus. laforge has posted comments on this change by laforge. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41669?usp=email ) Change subject: pySim.esim.saip: Fix compatibility with pytohn < 3.11 ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41669?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I8ba29d42c8d7bf0a36772cc3370eff1f6afa879f Gerrit-Change-Number: 41669 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu> Gerrit-Attention: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu> Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 16:36:44 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes

1 0