27 Jan
2011
27 Jan
'11
9:59 p.m.
Hi laf0rge,
wireshark has more strict compile settings and found this:
#define GSMTAP_TETRA_AACH 0x02 #define GSMTAP_TETRA_AACH 0x03
I would remove the second occurrence and renumber the other members? Or should I remove the first one and go with the value of 0x03?
z.
28 Jan
28 Jan
5:28 a.m.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:59:44PM +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
Hi laf0rge,
wireshark has more strict compile settings and found this:
#define GSMTAP_TETRA_AACH 0x02 #define GSMTAP_TETRA_AACH 0x03
I would remove the second occurrence and renumber the other members? Or should I remove the first one and go with the value of 0x03?
as nobody is using that code yet for anything, feel free to renumber.
--
- Harald Welte laforge@gnumonks.org http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
5393
Age (days ago)
5394
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Harald Welte -
Holger Hans Peter Freyther