Attention is currently required from: fixeria, pespin.
neels has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/36459?usp=email )
Change subject: msc: add TC_lu_tmsi_noauth_notmsi
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
File msc/MSC_Tests.ttcn:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/36459/comment/86958c0d_fb6a…
PS1, Line 7312: valueof
cosmetic: `use_mi` is a template parameter, so you can
pass `ts_MI_TMSI_LV` directly, without having […]
would it not have to be a
"template (value)" arg? So far it is "template (omit)", and I do still
not understand the fine points of what the difference is.
I am guilty as charged: I don't care very much about ttcn3 cosmetics, I'm happy
when ttcn3 runs the tests the way it should and that's it, because that consistently
already takes 10 times longer than I had patience for it...
When there is no actual practical effect, then we are only just sucking even more time
into this.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/36459?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If10b9987395670b084ff8ad6d1f033ff46896d75
Gerrit-Change-Number: 36459
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 13:42:21 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment