laforge has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ci/+/38251?usp=email )
Change subject: manuals: publish pyosmocom manuals for releases
......................................................................
manuals: publish pyosmocom manuals for releases
Adjust the building and publishing commands to work for pyosmocom.
Remove the 0.0.3 release from TAGS_IGNORE, because it already has
manuals.
Skip "apt-get -y build-dep" and adjusting "debian/control" if that file
does not exist, as it is the case with the 0.0.3 and 0.0.4 releases of
pyosmocom.
Change-Id: I3799cf825937cdd8dfca9fbd98e8b6b159f7cea8
---
M scripts/manuals/publish-manuals-for-tags.sh
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Approvals:
Jenkins Builder: Verified
pespin: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve
laforge: Looks good to me, approved
diff --git a/scripts/manuals/publish-manuals-for-tags.sh b/scripts/manuals/publish-manuals-for-tags.sh
index 690eafc..50b7a3b 100755
--- a/scripts/manuals/publish-manuals-for-tags.sh
+++ b/scripts/manuals/publish-manuals-for-tags.sh
@@ -203,7 +203,6 @@
pyosmocom:0.0.1,
pyosmocom:0.0.2,
- pyosmocom:0.0.3,
"
mkdir -p \
@@ -331,8 +330,10 @@
git clean -dxf
# Fix depends on packages that don't exist anymore
- sed -i 's/dh-systemd \(.*\),//g' debian/control
- sed -i 's/python-minimal,//g' debian/control
+ if [ -e debian/control ]; then
+ sed -i 's/dh-systemd \(.*\),//g' debian/control
+ sed -i 's/python-minimal,//g' debian/control
+ fi
}
# $1: repository
@@ -367,7 +368,9 @@
# Install dependencies
case $repo in
*)
- apt-get -y build-dep /build
+ if [ -e debian/control ]; then
+ apt-get -y build-dep /build
+ fi
;;
esac
@@ -386,6 +389,9 @@
osmo-epdg)
su build -c \"make -C docs/manuals\"
;;
+ pyosmocom)
+ su build -c \"make -C docs html latexpdf\"
+ ;;
*)
su build -c \"autoreconf -fi\"
su build -c \"./configure $configure_opts\"
@@ -404,6 +410,9 @@
osmo-epdg)
su build -c \"make -C docs/manuals publish\"
;;
+ pyosmocom)
+ su build -c \"make -C docs publish publish-html\"
+ ;;
*)
su build -c \"make -C doc/manuals publish\"
;;
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ci/+/38251?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ci
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I3799cf825937cdd8dfca9fbd98e8b6b159f7cea8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38251
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Attention is currently required from: fixeria, lynxis lazus, pespin.
laforge has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/37924?usp=email )
Change subject: s1ap_proxy: Support replying errors
......................................................................
Patch Set 5: Code-Review+1
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS2:
> Let's keep this patch in review until we have functional or at least unit tests.
So what is the status here? Why do we have no unit nor functional/integration tests for this patch? Instead we had a lengthy debate about patch review priorities. I agree with @pespin that it's not acceptable to delay a patch for a month - but then I also agree with @fixeria that we should have at least some test coverage. Let's find a solution, please.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/37924?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: erlang/osmo-s1gw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I242e84fb09b00f4794b6e1aa770f348a0e60aea4
Gerrit-Change-Number: 37924
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:41:43 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
laforge has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/38253?usp=email )
Change subject: contrib/jenkins: add SKIP_CLEAN_WORKSPACE
......................................................................
contrib/jenkins: add SKIP_CLEAN_WORKSPACE
In order to run this script from pyosmocom's contrib/jenkins.sh script,
we want to skip the clean workspace step. Add an environment variable to
do that.
Related: OS#6570
Change-Id: Ic8dc9b85da17719195f7374d37eccb4dedba6ce8
---
M contrib/jenkins.sh
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Approvals:
pespin: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve
Jenkins Builder: Verified
laforge: Looks good to me, approved
diff --git a/contrib/jenkins.sh b/contrib/jenkins.sh
index 42bf5af..5fa5226 100755
--- a/contrib/jenkins.sh
+++ b/contrib/jenkins.sh
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
# * WITH_MANUALS: build manual PDFs if set to "1"
# * PUBLISH: upload manuals after building if set to "1" (ignored without WITH_MANUALS = "1")
# * JOB_TYPE: one of 'test', 'distcheck', 'pylint', 'docs'
+# * SKIP_CLEAN_WORKSPACE: don't run osmo-clean-workspace.sh (for pyosmocom CI)
#
export PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1
@@ -16,7 +17,9 @@
exit 1
fi
-osmo-clean-workspace.sh
+if [ -z "$SKIP_CLEAN_WORKSPACE" ]; then
+ osmo-clean-workspace.sh
+fi
case "$JOB_TYPE" in
"test")
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/38253?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
Gerrit-Project: pysim
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic8dc9b85da17719195f7374d37eccb4dedba6ce8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38253
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
dexter has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/38254?usp=email )
Change subject: tests: sanitize all cards before running tests
......................................................................
tests: sanitize all cards before running tests
Even though our tests are written in a way that they shouldn't interfere
with each other, it may happen that one testrun writes content to a file
that upsets a different testrun. The resulting problems are often
difficult to diagnose.
To minimize the problem, let's reset the cards to a defined state before
running the actual tests. This can be done using pySim-shell's export
feature. We can generate a backup from a known good state and then play
back the backup to reset files that have been changed. Files that didn't
change will not be written thanks to the conserve_write feature of
pySim-shell.
Related: OS#4384
Change-Id: I42eaf61280968518164f2280245136fd30a603ce
---
M contrib/jenkins.sh
A tests/card_sanitizer/backup.script
A tests/card_sanitizer/card_backup_3b991800118822334455667760_2222334455667788990.script
A tests/card_sanitizer/card_backup_3b9a940092027593110001020221_1122334455667788990.script
A tests/card_sanitizer/card_backup_3b9f95801fc78031e073f62113674d4516004301008f_89445310150011013678.script
A tests/card_sanitizer/card_backup_3b9f96801f878031e073fe211b674a357530350265f8_8949440000001155314.script
A tests/card_sanitizer/card_backup_3b9f96801f878031e073fe211b674a4c753034054ba9_8988211000000467343.script
A tests/card_sanitizer/card_backup_3b9f96801fc78031a073be21136743200718000001a5_8988211320300000028.script
A tests/card_sanitizer/card_backup_3b9f96801fc78031a073be21136744220610000001a9_8988219000000117833.script
A tests/card_sanitizer/card_data.csv
A tests/card_sanitizer/card_sanitizer.py
A tests/card_sanitizer/restore.script
12 files changed, 18,152 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/pysim refs/changes/54/38254/1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/38254?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Gerrit-Project: pysim
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I42eaf61280968518164f2280245136fd30a603ce
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38254
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Attention is currently required from: fixeria, lynxis lazus.
pespin has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/37924?usp=email )
Change subject: s1ap_proxy: Support replying errors
......................................................................
Patch Set 5:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS4:
> And yet another week passed with this commit blocked.
One month after submission and my patch is still blocked in here.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/37924?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: erlang/osmo-s1gw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I242e84fb09b00f4794b6e1aa770f348a0e60aea4
Gerrit-Change-Number: 37924
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:27:51 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>