- gerrit-log - lists.osmocom.org

[XL] Change in upf-benchmark[master]: Initial version of improved osmo-pfcp-tool from osmo-upf.git
by laforge 08 Oct '24

08 Oct '24

Attention is currently required from: neels, pespin. laforge has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/upf-benchmark/+/38327?usp=email ) Change subject: Initial version of improved osmo-pfcp-tool from osmo-upf.git ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: Verified+1 (1 comment) Patchset: PS1: > Just to be clear, I even want to rename the osmo-pfcp-tool since the current state is not really tha […] Done -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/upf-benchmark/+/38327?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: upf-benchmark Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I179d575f53ef5797f296e13cd4d52a043fc4c1c1 Gerrit-Change-Number: 38327 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 16:59:52 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[XL] Change in upf-benchmark[master]: Initial version of improved osmo-pfcp-tool from osmo-upf.git
by laforge 08 Oct '24

08 Oct '24

Attention is currently required from: neels, pespin. laforge has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/upf-benchmark/+/38327?usp=email ) Change subject: Initial version of improved osmo-pfcp-tool from osmo-upf.git ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/upf-benchmark/+/38327?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: upf-benchmark Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I179d575f53ef5797f296e13cd4d52a043fc4c1c1 Gerrit-Change-Number: 38327 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 16:59:40 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes

1 0

[XS] Change in ...pyosmocom[master]: tag 0.0.6 for osmocom.construct.Asn1DerInteger
by dexter 08 Oct '24

08 Oct '24

dexter has posted comments on this change by dexter. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/python/pyosmocom/+/38366?usp=email ) Change subject: tag 0.0.6 for osmocom.construct.Asn1DerInteger ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) Patchset: PS1: I hope I have done everything correctly, please have a critical look. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/python/pyosmocom/+/38366?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: python/pyosmocom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I195685356ba4f6f06d5dbe12638e07320f0c70da Gerrit-Change-Number: 38366 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 15:22:34 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No

1 0

[XS] Change in ...pyosmocom[master]: tag 0.0.6 for osmocom.construct.Asn1DerInteger
by dexter 08 Oct '24

08 Oct '24

dexter has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/python/pyosmocom/+/38366?usp=email ) Change subject: tag 0.0.6 for osmocom.construct.Asn1DerInteger ...................................................................... tag 0.0.6 for osmocom.construct.Asn1DerInteger Change-Id: I195685356ba4f6f06d5dbe12638e07320f0c70da --- M debian/changelog M pyproject.toml 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/python/pyosmocom refs/changes/66/38366/1 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 0b15a26..c803c83 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +pyosmocom (0.0.6) unstable; urgency=medium + + * tlv/cosmetic: improve import of osmocom functions + + -- Harald Welte <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Tue, 08 Oct 2024 17:09:43 +0200 + pyosmocom (0.0.5) unstable; urgency=medium [ Oliver Smith ] diff --git a/pyproject.toml b/pyproject.toml index 8d81d3e..16ac663 100644 --- a/pyproject.toml +++ b/pyproject.toml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ [project] name = "pyosmocom" -version = "0.0.5" +version = "0.0.6" dependencies = [ "gsm0338", "construct >= 2.9.51" -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/python/pyosmocom/+/38366?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: newchange Gerrit-Project: python/pyosmocom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I195685356ba4f6f06d5dbe12638e07320f0c70da Gerrit-Change-Number: 38366 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[M] Change in osmo-ttcn3-hacks[master]: ggsn: testenv: run SUT on bridge instead of lo
by osmith 08 Oct '24

08 Oct '24

Attention is currently required from: fixeria, laforge. osmith has posted comments on this change by osmith. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38341?usp=email ) Change subject: ggsn: testenv: run SUT on bridge instead of lo ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) Patchset: PS1: > I didn't like the complexity and overhead of a dockerized setup. Me neither, especially with having lots of docker containers that need to be built and having duplicated configs that get out of sync. That's why I wrote the testenv script (OS#6494). > I'm not sure if the testenv basis will change much in that regard. It is much simpler in several ways: * only one container instead of several * using the container is optional * no duplicate configs that get out of sync (like https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38021) * for most Osmocom programs, we only need a simple testenv.cfg and osmo-$program.cfg file, for example: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38267 > All this overhead with qeum virtual machines still seems like a work-around to understanding the real problem to me... This is not a workaround. QEMU is required to test the kernel GTP-U feature of osmo-ggsn with different kernels as it was previously implemented in docker-playground (OS#3208). The configs for the GGSN testsuite are by far the most complex, because we run it in all of these combinations (already in docker-playground, I just ported it to testenv here and made it more generic in the process by using osmo-config-merge etc.): * osmo-ggsn + {all,v4_only,v4_only,v4v6_only} APNs * osmo-ggsn with kernel GTP-U (needs QEMU) + {v4_only,v4_only,v4v6_only} APNs * open5gs > When I develop a patch for any of our osmocom projcets, I'm always end up running all tests suites locally / natively / directly on my machine. OK, that seems to answer that my assumption was wrong: "I'm assuming that people aren't really running osmo-ggsn directly with the testsuite with these configs". I'll change the patch so the configs have 127.0.0.x again, so this still works as expected. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38341?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib768603b0050fe62baff39cab982a850eb91f49a Gerrit-Change-Number: 38341 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 12:45:40 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[M] Change in upf-benchmark[master]: Rename osmo-pfcp-tool to osmo-upf-genload
by pespin 08 Oct '24

08 Oct '24

Attention is currently required from: laforge. pespin has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/upf-benchmark/+/38354?usp=email ) Change subject: Rename osmo-pfcp-tool to osmo-upf-genload ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) Patchset: PS1: > loadgen (for load generator) would be more natural to me, given that in english, "load generator" is […] I was thinking more in the sense of "generate load", but I have no strong opinion, I can change it. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/upf-benchmark/+/38354?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: upf-benchmark Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie36379b5dcf4ab86276dfda9e25410fe41db1d93 Gerrit-Change-Number: 38354 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 12:19:09 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>

1 0

[M] Change in upf-benchmark[master]: Rename osmo-pfcp-tool to osmo-upf-genload
by laforge 08 Oct '24

08 Oct '24

Attention is currently required from: pespin. laforge has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/upf-benchmark/+/38354?usp=email ) Change subject: Rename osmo-pfcp-tool to osmo-upf-genload ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1 (1 comment) Patchset: PS1: loadgen (for load generator) would be more natural to me, given that in english, "load generator" is a well-known phrase, but "generator of load" sounds awkward. But well... -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/upf-benchmark/+/38354?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: upf-benchmark Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie36379b5dcf4ab86276dfda9e25410fe41db1d93 Gerrit-Change-Number: 38354 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 12:17:19 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes

1 0

[L] Change in upf-benchmark[master]: Initial tunend and tunmap testsuites for osmo-upf
by laforge 08 Oct '24

08 Oct '24

Attention is currently required from: pespin. laforge has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/upf-benchmark/+/38353?usp=email ) Change subject: Initial tunend and tunmap testsuites for osmo-upf ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/upf-benchmark/+/38353?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: upf-benchmark Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Iffe344975fa16621959f7306e095451e4421de26 Gerrit-Change-Number: 38353 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 12:16:19 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes

1 0

[XL] Change in upf-benchmark[master]: Initial version of improved osmo-pfcp-tool from osmo-upf.git
by laforge 08 Oct '24

08 Oct '24

Attention is currently required from: neels, pespin. laforge has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/upf-benchmark/+/38327?usp=email ) Change subject: Initial version of improved osmo-pfcp-tool from osmo-upf.git ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: Code-Review+1 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/upf-benchmark/+/38327?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: upf-benchmark Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I179d575f53ef5797f296e13cd4d52a043fc4c1c1 Gerrit-Change-Number: 38327 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 12:15:39 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes

1 0

[M] Change in osmo-ttcn3-hacks[master]: ggsn: testenv: run SUT on bridge instead of lo
by laforge 08 Oct '24

08 Oct '24

Attention is currently required from: fixeria, osmith. laforge has posted comments on this change by osmith. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38341?usp=email ) Change subject: ggsn: testenv: run SUT on bridge instead of lo ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) Patchset: PS1: > It is still possible to run it without docker/podman when using `./testenv. […] When I develop a patch for any of our osmocom projcets, I'm always end up running all tests suites locally / natively / directly on my machine. I didn't like the complexity and overhead of a dockerized setup. I'm not sure if the testenv basis will change much in that regard. All this overhead with qeum virtual machines still seems like a work-around to understanding the real problem to me... -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38341?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib768603b0050fe62baff39cab982a850eb91f49a Gerrit-Change-Number: 38341 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 12:15:03 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

gerrit-log