Attention is currently required from: pespin, dexter.
osmith has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/34194 )
Change subject: PCUIF: use confirmation flag in struct gsm_pcu_if_pch
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(2 comments)
Commit Message:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/34194/comment/1e7f00f1_5423…
PS1, Line 9: see Depends
no depends in the commit msg
Patchset:
PS1:
I'm not sure about the name of the variable, see https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/34190/comments/5a0bbabc_378328a0. Otherwise this patch looks good to me.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/34194
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I7017ca20ca7e0b77d0f363121e4f17280e39e8ac
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34194
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 13:41:31 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: dexter.
osmith has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/34193 )
Change subject: GTP_Templates: fix wrong function name
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/34193
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4235bc727bf8e71d1ef4a43c830706b6e1c826c9
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34193
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 13:39:04 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin, dexter.
osmith has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/34192 )
Change subject: pcuif_proto: use confirmation flag in struct gsm_pcu_if_pch
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
File src/osmo-bsc/pcu_sock.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/34192/comment/0cb4d8e8_9c9c2240
PS1, Line 552: if (pch->confirmed_imm_ass)
* What happens if using a newer osmo-bsc with an older osmo-pcu which does not send the field? (see https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/34191/comments/2ac37623_217744e6)
* This also makes me think naming it just imm_ass in the struct makes more sense, and commenting on the struct that it is for both paging and imm ass, see my comment here: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/34190/comments/5a0bbabc_378328a0 (but given that I'm not so familiar with the code, maybe there's a good reason to not do this?)
Otherwise LGTM.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/34192
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I3d2842626b7e8325860ea3160c7d900d39e953a0
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34192
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 13:36:15 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin, dexter.
osmith has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/34190 )
Change subject: pcuif_proto: add confirmation flag to struct gsm_pcu_if_pch
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
(2 comments)
Commit Message:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/34190/comment/bea98297_9d345d25
PS1, Line 17: Depends: osmo-pcu.git Ia202862aafc1f0cb6601574ef61eb9155de11f04
this patch depends on this patch? :)
File src/pcu_l1_if.cpp:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/34190/comment/5a0bbabc_378328a0
PS1, Line 303: imm_ass
As somebody not so familiar with the code, I find it confusing that the variable gets a different name here.
My understanding is that the struct gsm_pcu_if_pch is used for both immediate assignment and paging, and for imm ass we always set confirm and for paging we don't. Maybe it makes sense to comment this in the struct (right now it says it's only for imm ass, does not mention paging), and just name the variable imm_ass in the struct?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/34190
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia202862aafc1f0cb6601574ef61eb9155de11f04
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34190
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 13:29:40 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin, dexter.
osmith has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/34191 )
Change subject: pcuif_proto: use confirmation flag in struct gsm_pcu_if_pch
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
Commit Message:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/34191/comment/56af19ba_263a767f
PS1, Line 11:
I'd mention here that the flag gets added in osmo-pcu.git Ia202862aafc1f0cb6601574ef61eb9155de11f04
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/34191
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I3364d2268bdef9c4d2feeb8e3d51a64e34bca68c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34191
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 12:58:53 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin, dexter.
osmith has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/34191 )
Change subject: pcuif_proto: use confirmation flag in struct gsm_pcu_if_pch
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
File include/osmo-bts/pcuif_proto.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/34191/comment/2ac37623_217744e6
PS1, Line 235: bool confirmed_imm_ass;
Wwhat happens if using a newer osmo-bts with an older osmo-pcu which does not send the field?
Otherwise LGTM.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/34191
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I3364d2268bdef9c4d2feeb8e3d51a64e34bca68c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34191
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 12:56:54 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
dexter has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/34193 )
Change subject: GTP_Templates: fix wrong function name
......................................................................
GTP_Templates: fix wrong function name
The decoder function that decodes the RIM ROUTING ADDRESS should be
called dec_RIM_Routing_Address_GTPC and not dec_PCUIF_pch_dt
Change-Id: I4235bc727bf8e71d1ef4a43c830706b6e1c826c9
---
M library/GTP_Templates.ttcn
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-ttcn3-hacks refs/changes/93/34193/1
diff --git a/library/GTP_Templates.ttcn b/library/GTP_Templates.ttcn
index 267e2a7..8ab830e 100644
--- a/library/GTP_Templates.ttcn
+++ b/library/GTP_Templates.ttcn
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@
}
external function enc_RIM_Routing_Address_GTPC(in RIM_Routing_Address_GTPC ra) return octetstring
with { extension "prototype(convert) encode(RAW)" };
- external function dec_PCUIF_pch_dt(in octetstring stream) return RIM_Routing_Address_GTPC
+ external function dec_RIM_Routing_Address_GTPC(in octetstring stream) return RIM_Routing_Address_GTPC
with { extension "prototype(convert) decode(RAW)" };
/* RAN_Information_Request */
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/34193
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4235bc727bf8e71d1ef4a43c830706b6e1c826c9
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34193
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange