June 2023 - gerrit-log - lists.osmocom.org

[M] Change in osmo-pcu[master]: Avoid using N3105 in UL TBFs

by pespin

pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/33263 ) Change subject: Avoid using N3105 in UL TBFs ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: (1 comment) Patchset: PS2: > PCU_Tests. […] TTCN3 fixed here: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33269 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/33263 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I4d4f4d4d3e6e0539ea8ec2395bed00d059b84e04 Gerrit-Change-Number: 33263 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:22:44 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

2 years

1
0
0 0

[M] Change in osmo-ttcn3-hacks[master]: pcu: Rework test TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_resource_req_n3105_ma...

by pespin

pespin has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33269 ) Change subject: pcu: Rework test TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_resource_req_n3105_max to base it on T3168 ...................................................................... pcu: Rework test TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_resource_req_n3105_max to base it on T3168 N3105 is used for DL TBFs only (as tested by TC_n3105_max_t3195). The test TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_resource_req_n3105_max is hence wrongly written and should be based on T3168. Since recently, osmo-pcu also moved to using T3168 in the scenario triggered by this test, hence move to using it. Related: osmo-pcu.git Change-Id I87dff68dedd06b60501e7586d20faf02bb1f0c93 Change-Id: Ibdfa9879cc56f5e2090cee0d3d70ee5df7c90454 --- M pcu/PCU_Tests.ttcn 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-ttcn3-hacks refs/changes/69/33269/1 diff --git a/pcu/PCU_Tests.ttcn b/pcu/PCU_Tests.ttcn index f859b9b..9388f8f 100644 --- a/pcu/PCU_Tests.ttcn +++ b/pcu/PCU_Tests.ttcn @@ -3373,7 +3373,7 @@ * ending, by means of sending a Packet Resource Request on ul slot provided by * last Pkt Ul ACK's RRBP. new Pkt Ul Ass is never confirmed by the MS in this test. * See 3GPP TS 44.060 sec 9.3.2.4.2 "Non-extended uplink TBF mode" */ -testcase TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_resource_req_n3105_max() runs on RAW_PCU_Test_CT { +testcase TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_resource_req_t3168() runs on RAW_PCU_Test_CT { var PCUIF_info_ind info_ind; var RlcmacDlBlock dl_block; var octetstring data := f_rnd_octstring(10); @@ -3383,9 +3383,10 @@ var BTS_PDTCH_Block data_msg; var template RlcmacDlBlock acknack_tmpl; var GprsMS ms; - const integer N3105_MAX := 2; - var integer N3105 := 0; - timer T_3195 := 1.0 + 0.5; /* 0.5: extra offset since we cannot match exactly */ + var integer cnt_rrbp := 0; + var integer cnt_dummy_after_timeout := 0; + /* Maximum T3168 value = 8 * 500 ms = 4s => * 4 retrans = 16s */ + timer T_3168 := 16.0 + 0.5; /* 0.5: extra offset since we cannot match exactly */ /* Initialize NS/BSSGP side */ f_init_bssgp(); @@ -3395,9 +3396,7 @@ /* Initialize the PCU interface abstraction */ info_ind := valueof(ts_PCUIF_INFO_default(c_PCUIF_Flags_noMCS)); - /* Speedup test: */ - info_ind.n3105 := N3105_MAX; - info_ind.t3195 := 1; + /* TODO: Speedup test by sending a PCU_IF_SAPI_BCCH SI13 with T3168=0 (500ms) */ f_init_raw(testcasename(), info_ind); /* Establish BSSGP connection to the PCU */ @@ -3423,6 +3422,7 @@ /* TODO: verify TBF_EST and FinalACK are both '1' above */ /* Send PACKET RESOURCE REQUEST to request a new UL TBF */ + T_3168.start; f_ms_tx_ul_block(ms, ts_RLC_UL_CTRL_ACK(ts_RlcMacUlCtrl_PKT_RES_REQ(ms.tlli, omit)), sched_fn); /* Now Keep ignoring the Pkt Ul Ass on PACCH: */ @@ -3433,12 +3433,18 @@ arfcn := f_trxnr2arfcn(valueof(nr.trx_nr)), block_nr := nr.blk_nr)); alt { - [not T_3195.running] BTS.receive(tr_PCUIF_DATA_PDTCH(nr.bts_nr, + [] BTS.receive(tr_PCUIF_DATA_PDTCH(nr.bts_nr, tr_PCUIF_DATA(nr.trx_nr, nr.ts_nr, sapi := PCU_IF_SAPI_PDTCH), tr_RLCMAC_UL_PACKET_ASS)) -> value data_msg { + /* We should not be receiving PKT UL ASS anymore after T3168 timeout */ + if (not T_3168.running) { + setverdict(fail, log2str("Unexpected PKT UL ASS after T3168 timeout: ", data_msg)); + f_shutdown(__BFILE__, __LINE__); + } + if (f_dl_block_rrbp_valid(data_msg.dl_block)) { - log("Ignoring RRBP N3105 ", N3105); - N3105 := N3105 + 1; + log("Ignoring RRBP ", cnt_rrbp); + cnt_rrbp := cnt_rrbp + 1; } nr := ts_TsTrxBtsNum; BTS.send(ts_PCUIF_RTS_REQ(nr.bts_nr, nr.trx_nr, nr.ts_nr, @@ -3447,15 +3453,9 @@ block_nr := nr.blk_nr)); repeat; } - /* At this point in time (N3105_MAX reached), PCU already moved TBF to - * RELEASE state so no data for it is tx'ed, hence the dummy blocks: - */ - [N3105 == N3105_MAX] BTS.receive(tr_PCUIF_DATA_PDTCH(nr.bts_nr, + [] BTS.receive(tr_PCUIF_DATA_PDTCH(nr.bts_nr, tr_PCUIF_DATA(nr.trx_nr, nr.ts_nr, sapi := PCU_IF_SAPI_PDTCH), tr_RLCMAC_DL_DUMMY_CTRL)) -> value data_msg { - if (not T_3195.running) { - T_3195.start; - } nr := ts_TsTrxBtsNum; BTS.send(ts_PCUIF_RTS_REQ(nr.bts_nr, nr.trx_nr, nr.ts_nr, sapi := PCU_IF_SAPI_PDTCH, fn := 0, @@ -3463,44 +3463,25 @@ block_nr := nr.blk_nr)); repeat; } - [N3105 == N3105_MAX] BTS.receive(tr_PCUIF_DATA_PDTCH(nr.bts_nr, + [] BTS.receive(tr_PCUIF_DATA_PDTCH(nr.bts_nr, tr_PCUIF_DATA(nr.trx_nr, nr.ts_nr, sapi := PCU_IF_SAPI_PDTCH), omit)) -> value data_msg { - /* We may already receive idle blocks before our own TTCN3 timer - * triggers due to the TBF being released. Keep going until our T_3195 triggers. */ - nr := ts_TsTrxBtsNum; - BTS.send(ts_PCUIF_RTS_REQ(nr.bts_nr, nr.trx_nr, nr.ts_nr, - sapi := PCU_IF_SAPI_PDTCH, fn := 0, - arfcn := f_trxnr2arfcn(valueof(nr.trx_nr)), - block_nr := nr.blk_nr)); - repeat; + + /* T3168 expired and we are not receiving blocks anymore, meaning PCU released the TBF. */ + break; } - /* We receive Dummy blocks in between Pkt Ul Ass while PCU waits for us to ack it */ - [not T_3195.running] BTS.receive(tr_PCUIF_DATA_PDTCH(nr.bts_nr, - tr_PCUIF_DATA(nr.trx_nr, nr.ts_nr, sapi := PCU_IF_SAPI_PDTCH), - tr_RLCMAC_DL_DUMMY_CTRL)) -> value data_msg { - log("Ignoring Dummy block FN ", data_msg.raw.fn); - nr := ts_TsTrxBtsNum; - BTS.send(ts_PCUIF_RTS_REQ(nr.bts_nr, nr.trx_nr, nr.ts_nr, - sapi := PCU_IF_SAPI_PDTCH, fn := 0, - arfcn := f_trxnr2arfcn(valueof(nr.trx_nr)), - block_nr := nr.blk_nr)); - repeat; - } - [T_3195.running] T_3195.timeout { - log("T_3195 timeout"); - /* Done in alt, wait for pending RTS initiated previously in - * above case before continuing (expect nothing to be sent since there's no active TBF): */ - BTS.receive(tr_PCUIF_DATA_PDTCH(nr.bts_nr, - tr_PCUIF_DATA(nr.trx_nr, nr.ts_nr, sapi := PCU_IF_SAPI_PDTCH), - omit)); - } [] BTS.receive { setverdict(fail, "Unexpected BTS message"); f_shutdown(__BFILE__, __LINE__); } } + /* Check that we received at least a few PKT UL ASS before T3168 expiration */ + if (cnt_rrbp <= 3) { + setverdict(fail, log2str("Received only ", cnt_rrbp, " before T3168 timeout!")); + f_shutdown(__BFILE__, __LINE__); + } + f_shutdown(__BFILE__, __LINE__, final := true); } @@ -7145,7 +7126,7 @@ execute( TC_dl_multislot_tbf_ms_class_from_2phase() ); execute( TC_ul_multislot_tbf_ms_class_from_2phase() ); execute( TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_resource_req() ); - execute( TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_resource_req_n3105_max() ); + execute( TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_resource_req_t3168() ); execute( TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_dl_ack_nack() ); execute( TC_ul_tbf_reestablish_with_pkt_dl_ack_nack_egprs() ); -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33269 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ibdfa9879cc56f5e2090cee0d3d70ee5df7c90454 Gerrit-Change-Number: 33269 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: newchange

2 years

1
0
0 0

[M] Change in libosmo-netif[master]: stream: Factor out reconnection handling

by pespin

Attention is currently required from: daniel. pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33253 ) Change subject: stream: Factor out reconnection handling ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: Code-Review+1 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33253 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmo-netif Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I418377eabd465ee4ffce9b4440e96287c7734924 Gerrit-Change-Number: 33253 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:17:10 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

2 years

1
0
0 0

[M] Change in libosmo-netif[master]: examples: Use new stream API in {ipa-,}stream-{client,server}

by Jenkins Builder

Attention is currently required from: arehbein, pespin, daniel. Jenkins Builder has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33194 ) Change subject: examples: Use new stream API in {ipa-,}stream-{client,server} ...................................................................... Patch Set 10: (2 comments) File examples/stream-client.c: Robot Comment from checkpatch (run ID jenkins-gerrit-lint-8202): https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33194/comment/1e6d989e_70b6de33 PS10, Line 53: static int read_cb(struct osmo_stream_cli *conn, struct msgb* msg) "foo* bar" should be "foo *bar" File examples/stream-server.c: Robot Comment from checkpatch (run ID jenkins-gerrit-lint-8202): https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33194/comment/7962b6cb_c59cd7d7 PS10, Line 45: int read_cb(struct osmo_stream_srv *conn, struct msgb* msg) "foo* bar" should be "foo *bar" -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33194 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmo-netif Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I97a9979199c816686b32080534627f6f033e009e Gerrit-Change-Number: 33194 Gerrit-PatchSet: 10 Gerrit-Owner: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:07:34 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Gerrit-MessageType: comment

2 years

1
0
0 0

[M] Change in libosmo-netif[master]: stream: Factor out reconnection handling

by daniel

Attention is currently required from: pespin. daniel has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33253 ) Change subject: stream: Factor out reconnection handling ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: (1 comment) File src/stream.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33253/comment/0e690448_deb0f3c6 PS1, Line 472: osmo_fd_write_disable(&cli->ofd); > Disregard that, I moved it and special-case it to the cli->mode in the commit adding osmo_io support […] Done -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33253 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmo-netif Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I418377eabd465ee4ffce9b4440e96287c7734924 Gerrit-Change-Number: 33253 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:07:04 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

2 years

1
0
0 0

[M] Change in libosmo-netif[master]: stream: Factor out reconnection handling

by daniel

Attention is currently required from: pespin. Hello Jenkins Builder, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33253 to look at the new patch set (#3). Change subject: stream: Factor out reconnection handling ...................................................................... stream: Factor out reconnection handling Change-Id: I418377eabd465ee4ffce9b4440e96287c7734924 --- M src/stream.c 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/libosmo-netif refs/changes/53/33253/3 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33253 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmo-netif Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I418377eabd465ee4ffce9b4440e96287c7734924 Gerrit-Change-Number: 33253 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

2 years

1
0
0 0

[L] Change in libosmo-netif[master]: Add osmo_io support to osmo_stream_cli and osmo_stream_srv

by daniel

Attention is currently required from: arehbein, laforge, pespin. daniel has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33193 ) Change subject: Add osmo_io support to osmo_stream_cli and osmo_stream_srv ...................................................................... Patch Set 12: (1 comment) Patchset: PS10: > So I think the only relevant thing to wrap here is whether we want to have the 2 callback function p […] Your proposal is growing on me, but it would still be nice to hear from others. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33193 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmo-netif Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I2f52c7107c392b6f4b0bf2a84f8c873c084a200c Gerrit-Change-Number: 33193 Gerrit-PatchSet: 12 Gerrit-Owner: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:07:04 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

2 years

1
0
0 0

[M] Change in libosmo-netif[master]: stream: Factor out reconnection handling

by daniel

Attention is currently required from: pespin, daniel. daniel has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33253 ) Change subject: stream: Factor out reconnection handling ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: (1 comment) File src/stream.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33253/comment/48682011_396d89a9 PS1, Line 472: osmo_fd_write_disable(&cli->ofd); > Please look at osmo_iofd_free() and osmo_iofd_close() […] Disregard that, I moved it and special-case it to the cli->mode in the commit adding osmo_io support. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33253 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmo-netif Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I418377eabd465ee4ffce9b4440e96287c7734924 Gerrit-Change-Number: 33253 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 13:53:17 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

2 years

1
0
0 0

[M] Change in libosmo-netif[master]: stream: Factor out reconnection handling

by Jenkins Builder

Attention is currently required from: pespin. Jenkins Builder has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33253 ) Change subject: stream: Factor out reconnection handling ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: (1 comment) File src/stream.c: Robot Comment from checkpatch (run ID jenkins-gerrit-lint-8200): https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33253/comment/c7a3e886_93efc187 PS2, Line 470: switch(cli->state) { space required before the open parenthesis '(' -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33253 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmo-netif Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I418377eabd465ee4ffce9b4440e96287c7734924 Gerrit-Change-Number: 33253 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 13:52:14 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Gerrit-MessageType: comment

2 years

1
0
0 0

[M] Change in libosmo-netif[master]: examples: Use new stream API in {ipa-,}stream-{client,server}

by Jenkins Builder

Attention is currently required from: arehbein, pespin, daniel. Jenkins Builder has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33194 ) Change subject: examples: Use new stream API in {ipa-,}stream-{client,server} ...................................................................... Patch Set 9: (2 comments) File examples/stream-client.c: Robot Comment from checkpatch (run ID jenkins-gerrit-lint-8199): https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33194/comment/07976043_c925b900 PS9, Line 53: static int read_cb(struct osmo_stream_cli *conn, struct msgb* msg) "foo* bar" should be "foo *bar" File examples/stream-server.c: Robot Comment from checkpatch (run ID jenkins-gerrit-lint-8199): https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33194/comment/b7112542_f22b556c PS9, Line 45: int read_cb(struct osmo_stream_srv *conn, struct msgb* msg) "foo* bar" should be "foo *bar" -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-netif/+/33194 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmo-netif Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I97a9979199c816686b32080534627f6f033e009e Gerrit-Change-Number: 33194 Gerrit-PatchSet: 9 Gerrit-Owner: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 13:52:12 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Gerrit-MessageType: comment

2 years

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

gerrit-log June 2023