Attention is currently required from: fixeria.
Hello Jenkins Builder, pespin,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27618
to look at the new patch set (#2).
Change subject: fix gsm_bts_get_cbch(): CBCH can be allocated on Cn
......................................................................
fix gsm_bts_get_cbch(): CBCH can be allocated on Cn
According to 3GPP TS 45.002, table 3, unlike the CCCH+SDCCH/4+CBCH
combination, which can only be allocated on C0/TS0, the SDCCH/8+CBCH
can be allocated on C0..n/TS0..3. In other words, having CBCH on
e.g. TRX1/C1 is perfectly legal. This is why in gsm_bts_get_cbch()
we should check all transceivers, not just the C0.
Change-Id: Ie79ccff4f8f0f1134757ec0c35e18b58081cc158
Related: SYS#5905
---
M src/osmo-bsc/bts.c
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-bsc refs/changes/18/27618/2
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27618
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie79ccff4f8f0f1134757ec0c35e18b58081cc158
Gerrit-Change-Number: 27618
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Attention is currently required from: fixeria.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27620 )
Change subject: abis_rsl: always check return value of rsl_tlv_parse()
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
File src/osmo-bsc/abis_rsl.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27620/comment/b9ee5aad_1cd26128
PS1, Line 1224: if (rsl_tlv_parse(&tp, dh->data, msgb_l2len(msg) - sizeof(*dh)) < 0) {
You probably need to check that msgb_l2len(msg) >= sizeof(*dh) before derreferencing dh below.
Same applies for all new blocks you are adding.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27620
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id022628934e7d51ce66cb255baa88f24bf5c918a
Gerrit-Change-Number: 27620
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 16:21:22 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: fixeria.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27619 )
Change subject: fix bts_cbch_send_one(): use proper RSL Channel Number
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27619
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib5fd00bfd5e762ce0a56e73816162d0555976f8d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 27619
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 16:19:31 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-upf/+/27217 )
Change subject: libosmo-gtlv: add generic TLV de- and encoder
......................................................................
Patch Set 4:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS4:
there is not much difference in effort between moving to libosmocore now or later. I think I'd rather merge to osmo-upf.git first and then see about the move to libosmocore ... would marginally speed up the process of merging patches here.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-upf/+/27217
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-upf
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib0fd00d9f288ffe13b7e67701f3e47073587404a
Gerrit-Change-Number: 27217
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 14:46:01 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
neels has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27596 )
Change subject: hodec2: add penalty-time low-rxqual-ho
......................................................................
hodec2: add penalty-time low-rxqual-ho
When bad RxQual causes handover to a cell with weaker RxLev, then
handover oscillation *will* happen, as shown in test_rxqual.ho_vty.
Introduce a penalty timer for a cell where we had bad RxQual.
This delays handover back to the cell with stronger RxLev by the penalty
timeout; hopefully the interference is gone after the timeout.
Usually, we set new configuration elements so that osmo-bsc behaves the
same as before the config item was added. In this instance, this makes
no sense, because no-one ever wants handover oscillation from bad
RxQual, which is guaranteed to happen without the new penalty timer. Set
it to 60 seconds by default, same as other penalty timers.
Related: SYS#5911
Change-Id: I057b156604a104a26a7ce45d1c7adadbf452c932
---
M include/osmocom/bsc/handover_cfg.h
M src/osmo-bsc/handover_decision_2.c
M tests/handover/test_rxqual.ho_vty
M tests/handover_cfg.vty
4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Approvals:
laforge: Looks good to me, approved
pespin: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve
Jenkins Builder: Verified
diff --git a/include/osmocom/bsc/handover_cfg.h b/include/osmocom/bsc/handover_cfg.h
index 2bd2681..7d68e63 100644
--- a/include/osmocom/bsc/handover_cfg.h
+++ b/include/osmocom/bsc/handover_cfg.h
@@ -268,6 +268,13 @@
"Time to suspend re-assignment after an lchan was re-assigned because of low RxQual\n" \
"Seconds\n") \
\
+ HO_CFG_ONE_MEMBER(int, hodec2_penalty_low_rxqual_ho, 60, \
+ "handover2 ", "penalty-time low-rxqual-ho", "<0-99999>", atoi, "%d", as_is, \
+ HO_CFG_STR_HANDOVER2 \
+ HO_CFG_STR_PENALTY_TIME \
+ "Time to suspend handover back to a cell after bad RxQual caused handover away from it\n" \
+ "Seconds\n") \
+ \
HO_CFG_ONE_MEMBER(int, hodec2_retries, 0, \
"handover2 ", "retries", "<0-9>", atoi, "%d", as_is, \
HO_CFG_STR_HANDOVER2 \
diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/handover_decision_2.c b/src/osmo-bsc/handover_decision_2.c
index 14bc2d4..8627910 100644
--- a/src/osmo-bsc/handover_decision_2.c
+++ b/src/osmo-bsc/handover_decision_2.c
@@ -914,6 +914,19 @@
full_rate ? "TCH/F" : "TCH/H",
ho_reason_name(global_ho_reason));
handover_request(&req);
+
+ /* Apply penalty timer hodec2_penalty_low_rxqual_ho */
+ if (global_ho_reason == HO_REASON_INTERFERENCE
+ || global_ho_reason == HO_REASON_BAD_QUALITY) {
+ struct gsm0808_cell_id bts_id;
+ struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn = c->current.lchan->conn;
+ int timeout = ho_get_hodec2_penalty_low_rxqual_ho(c->current.bts->ho);
+ gsm_bts_cell_id(&bts_id, c->current.bts);
+ LOGPHOCAND(c, LOGL_DEBUG, "Applying penalty-time low-rxqual-ho %d s on bts %u (%s), reason: %s\n",
+ timeout, c->current.bts->nr, gsm0808_cell_id_name_c(OTC_SELECT, &bts_id),
+ ho_reason_name(global_ho_reason));
+ penalty_timers_add(conn, &conn->hodec2.penalty_timers, &bts_id, timeout);
+ }
}
return 0;
}
diff --git a/tests/handover/test_rxqual.ho_vty b/tests/handover/test_rxqual.ho_vty
index f64de52..6f86cf4 100644
--- a/tests/handover/test_rxqual.ho_vty
+++ b/tests/handover/test_rxqual.ho_vty
@@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
# See Performance Enhancements in a Frequency Hopping GSM Network (Nielsen Wigard 2002), Chapter
# 2.1.1, "Interference" in the list of triggers on p.157.
+# first show undesired oscillation when penalty-time low-rxqual-ho is disabled
+network
+ handover2 penalty-time low-rxqual-ho 0
+
create-n-bts 2
set-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/F - - - - - -
meas-rep repeat 9 lchan 0 0 1 0 rxlev 40 rxqual 6 ta 0 neighbors 30
@@ -20,10 +24,26 @@
expect-ts-use trx 1 0 states * TCH/F - - - - - -
# Now the channel is on bts 1, which has lower rxlev than bts 0.
-# The result is an undesired ho oscillation
+# The result is an undesired ho oscillation, because the penalty timer is zero
meas-rep lchan 1 0 1 0 rxlev 30 rxqual 0 ta 0 neighbors 40
expect-ho from lchan 1 0 1 0 to lchan 0 0 1 0
+
+# Set a proper penalty timeout and report bad-rxqual again
+network
+ handover2 penalty-time low-rxqual-ho 10
meas-rep repeat 10 lchan 0 0 1 0 rxlev 40 rxqual 6 ta 0 neighbors 30
expect-ho from lchan 0 0 1 0 to lchan 1 0 1 0
+
+# This time the penalty timer prevents oscillation
+meas-rep repeat 10 lchan 1 0 1 0 rxlev 30 rxqual 0 ta 0 neighbors 40
+expect-no-chan
+
+# After the penalty timeout passes, we do go back to the cell with stronger rxlev
+wait 10
meas-rep lchan 1 0 1 0 rxlev 30 rxqual 0 ta 0 neighbors 40
expect-ho from lchan 1 0 1 0 to lchan 0 0 1 0
+# If the rxqual is still bad here after the penalty timeout, well, then we quickly snap back to the weaker cell, once
+meas-rep repeat 10 lchan 0 0 1 0 rxlev 40 rxqual 6 ta 0 neighbors 30
+expect-ho from lchan 0 0 1 0 to lchan 1 0 1 0
+meas-rep repeat 10 lchan 1 0 1 0 rxlev 30 rxqual 0 ta 0 neighbors 40
+expect-no-chan
diff --git a/tests/handover_cfg.vty b/tests/handover_cfg.vty
index eb3ec3e..fb3c73c 100644
--- a/tests/handover_cfg.vty
+++ b/tests/handover_cfg.vty
@@ -190,6 +190,7 @@
handover2 penalty-time failed-ho (<0-99999>|default)
handover2 penalty-time failed-assignment (<0-99999>|default)
handover2 penalty-time low-rxqual-assignment (<0-99999>|default)
+ handover2 penalty-time low-rxqual-ho (<0-99999>|default)
handover2 retries (<0-9>|default)
handover2 congestion-check (disabled|<1-999>|now)
...
@@ -389,6 +390,7 @@
failed-ho Time to suspend handover for a subscriber after a failed handover into this cell; see also 'handover2 retries'
failed-assignment Time to suspend handover for a subscriber after a failed re-assignment within this cell; see also 'handover2 retries'
low-rxqual-assignment Time to suspend re-assignment after an lchan was re-assigned because of low RxQual
+ low-rxqual-ho Time to suspend handover back to a cell after bad RxQual caused handover away from it
OsmoBSC(config-net)# handover2 penalty-time max-distance ?
<0-99999> Seconds
@@ -613,6 +615,7 @@
failed-ho Time to suspend handover for a subscriber after a failed handover into this cell; see also 'handover2 retries'
failed-assignment Time to suspend handover for a subscriber after a failed re-assignment within this cell; see also 'handover2 retries'
low-rxqual-assignment Time to suspend re-assignment after an lchan was re-assigned because of low RxQual
+ low-rxqual-ho Time to suspend handover back to a cell after bad RxQual caused handover away from it
OsmoBSC(config-net-bts)# handover2 penalty-time max-distance ?
<0-99999> Seconds
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27596
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I057b156604a104a26a7ce45d1c7adadbf452c932
Gerrit-Change-Number: 27596
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
fixeria has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27618 )
Change subject: fix gsm_bts_get_cbch(): CBCH can be allocated on Cn
......................................................................
fix gsm_bts_get_cbch(): CBCH can be allocated on Cn
According to 3GPP TS 45.002, table 3, unlike the CCCH+SDCCH/4+CBCH
combination, which can only be allocated on C0/TS0, the SDCCH/8+CBCH
can be allocated on C0..n/TS0..3. In other words, having CBCH on
e.g. TRX1/C1 is perfectly legal. This is why in gsm_bts_get_cbch()
we should check all transceivers, not just the C0.
Change-Id: Ie79ccff4f8f0f1134757ec0c35e18b58081cc158
Related: SYS#5905
---
M src/osmo-bsc/bts.c
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-bsc refs/changes/18/27618/1
diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/bts.c b/src/osmo-bsc/bts.c
index d09aa48..e0757db 100644
--- a/src/osmo-bsc/bts.c
+++ b/src/osmo-bsc/bts.c
@@ -562,22 +562,21 @@
/* return the gsm_lchan for the CBCH (if it exists at all) */
struct gsm_lchan *gsm_bts_get_cbch(struct gsm_bts *bts)
{
- struct gsm_lchan *lchan = NULL;
struct gsm_bts_trx *trx = bts->c0;
if (trx->ts[0].pchan_from_config == GSM_PCHAN_CCCH_SDCCH4_CBCH)
- lchan = &trx->ts[0].lchan[2];
- else {
- int i;
- for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
- if (trx->ts[i].pchan_from_config == GSM_PCHAN_SDCCH8_SACCH8C_CBCH) {
- lchan = &trx->ts[i].lchan[2];
- break;
- }
+ return &trx->ts[0].lchan[2];
+
+ llist_for_each_entry(trx, &bts->trx_list, list) { /* C0..n */
+ unsigned int tn;
+ for (tn = 0; tn < 4; tn++) { /* TS0..3 */
+ struct gsm_bts_trx_ts *ts = &trx->ts[tn];
+ if (ts->pchan_from_config == GSM_PCHAN_SDCCH8_SACCH8C_CBCH)
+ return &ts->lchan[2];
}
}
- return lchan;
+ return NULL;
}
int gsm_set_bts_type(struct gsm_bts *bts, enum gsm_bts_type type)
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27618
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie79ccff4f8f0f1134757ec0c35e18b58081cc158
Gerrit-Change-Number: 27618
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange