gmr

gmr@lists.osmocom.org

55 discussions

Generator matrix used for TCH3 channel encoding
by wireless gmr 17 Dec '18

17 Dec '18

I am interested in finding the generator matrix used for TCH3 channel encoding (GEO-Mobile Radio Interface). I followed the installation steps indicated in OsmocomGMR. There was an example for FACCH3 channel to generate the G matrix. I modified the code for TCH3 (shown below) but the output results does not seems correct. I would really appreciate it if you can tell me what I am doing wrong in the code below. /* GMR-1 G/g matrix geneation forTCH3 */ /* (C) 2011 by Sylvain Munaut <tnt(a)246tNt.com> * All Rights Reserved * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU Affero General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */ #include <errno.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <osmocom/core/bits.h> #include <osmocom/core/utils.h> #include <osmocom/gmr1/l1/tch3.h> static void copy_bits(ubit_t *dst, int r, ubit_t *bits_e) { int i, j = 0; for(i=0;i<212;i++){ if (i<52 || i > 55){ dst[(208*r)+j] = bits_e[i]; j++; } } } static int pbm_save_bits(const char *filename, ubit_t *m, int x, int y) { FILE *fh; int i, j; fh = fopen(filename, "w"); if (!fh) return -EPERM; fprintf(fh, "P1\n%d %d\n", x, y); for (i=0; i<y; i++) for (j=0; j<x; j++) fprintf(fh, "%d%c", m[(i*x)+j], j==x-1 ? '\n' : ' '); fclose(fh); return 0; } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { ubit_t mat_G[208*160]; /* 208 lines of 160 pixels */ ubit_t mat_g[208]; /* 208 lines of 1 pixel */ ubit_t bits_e[212]; ubit_t bits_u1[160]; ubit_t bits_s[4]; uint8_t l1[10]; uint8_t l2[10]; int i; int j; int m = 0; memset(mat_G, 0x00, sizeof(mat_G)); memset(mat_g, 0x00, sizeof(mat_g)); memset(bits_s, 0x00, sizeof(bits_s)); memset(l1, 0x00, sizeof(l1)); memset(l2, 0x00, sizeof(l2)); gmr1_tch3_encode(bits_e, l1, l2, bits_s, NULL,m); copy_bits(mat_g, 0, bits_e); for (i=0; i<160; i++) { memset(l1, 0x00, sizeof(l1)); memset(l2, 0x00, sizeof(l2)); memset(bits_u1, 0, sizeof(bits_u1)); bits_u1[i] = 1; osmo_ubit2pbit_ext(l1, 0, bits_u1, 0, 80, 1); osmo_ubit2pbit_ext(l2, 0, bits_u1, 80, 80, 1); gmr1_tch3_encode(bits_e, l1, l2, bits_s, NULL,m); copy_bits(mat_G, i, bits_e); } for (i=0; i<160; i++) { for (j=0; j<208; j++) { mat_G[(i*208)+j] ^= mat_g[j]; } } pbm_save_bits("mat_G.pbm", mat_G, 160, 208); pbm_save_bits("mat_g.pbm", mat_g, 1, 208); printf("\n"); }

1 0

OsmoDevCon 2018 schedule planning
by Harald Welte 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

Dear Osmocom Community, [please respect the Reply-To and post all follow-up discussion to this to openbsc(a)lists.osmocom.org, so we avoid having long threads cross-posted to several mailing lists.] Like every year in early December, it is time to discuss as schedule for OsmoDevCon in the upcoming year. Note: Ths is about OsmoDevCon, the more private meeting of developers, *NOT* about OsmoCon, the public conference. == When, Who, Where == I propose the following date for OsmoDevCon 2018: April 20 - April 23rd, 2018 * Who: Active developers/contributors of Osmocom projects (as usual) * Where: IN-Berlin, Berlin (as usual) Please let me know ASAP if that proposed date works for everyone who'd want to attend. We can still change it now, but I would want to nail down the date pretty soon. == Format == After the experiment of reducing from 4 to 3 days last year (due to OsmoCon), we will again go for *four days* in 2018. However, we should clearly divide the days in a way that e.g. "GSM/3G" topics are on two days, while SDR+Other topics are on the other days, so people not interested in some topics can skip one or two days, as needed. We could even divide it further like: * 1 day 3GPP RAN (osmo-bts, osmo-bsc, osmo-pcu, virt_phy, fake_trx, ...) * 1 day 3GPP CN (osmo-msc, osmo-hlr, osmo-sip-connector, nextepc, etc.) * 2 days misc Regards, and looking forward to meeting you [again] in 2018, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

1 1

Planning for OsmoCon + OsmoDevCon
by Harald Welte 14 Oct '17

14 Oct '17

[cross-post to many lists, please follow-up-to openbsc(a)lists.osmocom.org] Dear all, time is flying, and I would like to start early with discussions and planning about OsmoCon and OsmoDevCon in 2018. It helps to start early. Side note: We have some pending issues about the events from last year at http://osmocom.org/projects/osmo-dev-con/issues - I've incorporated them in the text below. == OsmoDevCon == For OsmoDevCon, I think it's easy: We keep it as-is. Same procedure as every year, which means: * same venue, same catering options * same concept of 'anyone contributing to Osmocom can apply for registration until all seats are taken' * same idea of inviting some few speaker[s] doing other FOSS mobile communications work to join us The parts that we need to change, IMHO: * don't reduce from 4 to 3 days like last year. Have full 4 days again * sort topics per day / half-day, i.e. have "GSM/UMTS Cellular Infrastructure" days for BTS/BSC/NITB/MSC/HLR/SGSN/GGSN & Co, but then have other days for other projects. This would enable people not interested in the [continued evolvement] of the cellular projects be able to skip those days, or to simply meet in an adjacent room for parallel hacking sessions/discussions * try to be a bit more structured with the schedule in general. The existing approach works for people who attend all the event all day long, but not so well for people with other plans / limited time Any further change requests or topics to discuss? Please note that Pablo Neira has offered to kindly host an OsmoDevCon in Seville (Spain). I've attended a number of netfilter workshops he organized there, and he's doing a great job! However, given the large number of attendees from Berlin (and Germany in general), I think this would make things more complicated, and more expensive for most attendees. If you disagree with that assessment: I'm open for having the discussion, I just thought it's more practical/economic to do it in Berlin. === 10 year Anniversary Party === Given that 2018 marks the 10 year anniversary of Dieter and me hacking with the Siemens BS-11 in 2008, I think the 2018 incarnation deserves some special celebration of some form. I have no concrete idea yet, but for sure we should so something, and it should be at/around OsmoDevCon. And for sure we should have a BS-11 around :) == OsmoCon == The public OsmoCon was welcomed and was a success. However, let's start this discussion with a review of last years event. === Registration === * Registrations came in way too late. Two weeks ahead of the event, we were considering to cancel it. And then within the last few days, we had to turn people down due to limited seating capacity * To make planning more reliable, we see on other option but to significantly raise the registration fee combined with an equally significant discount for early booking === Duration === * Many people requested multiple days rather than just one, in order to make more out of (long distance) travels. This is obvious, but as we had no idea how many people would attend at all (or if we have to cancel due to lack of attendance), planning multiple days in the first incarnation would have been high risk and a multitude of work * I would suggest to expand to two or even three days this week, possibly one days with tutorials and the other day with tech talks * Slightly less crammed schedule due to multiple days === Venue === We recognize this yearso venue was not the best option, due to * Bad ventilation in the basemenet * Difficult to find * No space next to the conference room where people can meet / hang out in parallel to talks (not everyone attends every talk) I still like the "understatement" of the venue. I'd prefer any hostel / non-profit / hackerspace / university over luxurious hotels any time. Going to an expensive venue means more or less automatically more expensive ticket fees, which again is more likely to exclude pure community members without a commercial activity related to Osmocom. So any future venue would ideally: * be able to hold slightly more people than this year * have a second room or large lobby in which people can meet for extended coffee breaks in parallel to some talks, as needed * be slightly easier to find (and we have to put up some signs outside and in the lobby) * have better WiFi and/or wired connectivity === Programme / Format === * less crammed over multiple days * some more "interactive" formats were requested, for users to provide feedback to developers * there was some discussion about topics / speakers in redmine last year, but not too much participation [until it was too late]. * I'd suggest a more formal CfP process with a submission deadline that allows us to publish a preliminary schedule long ahead of the event === Video Recordings === I think they were a big success, and it was a very big surprise that the CCC Video Operations Center was volunteering to help such a small and niche-interest event like OsmoCon. We should make sure that we can repeat this for 2018. == Dates / Frequency == Having OsmoCon and OsmoDevCon back to back becomes somewhat long, if OsmoCon is 2-3 days and OsmoDevCon is 4 days. Basically we're looking at a full week for those of you who would like to attend both events. But then, I think the number of people attending both events is actually not all that big. Without checking the details, I think not more than half of the OsmoDevCon attendees were attending OsmoCon. I would expect that tendency to remain or even increase. I still think it's good to keep them back-to-back. In terms of frequency, I would actually suggest we move to a 6-month cycle rather than a 12-month cycle. There's a lot of development going on at all time. I understand that not everyone is able to attend two events just on Osmocom, especially if it's a spare time / hobby type activity. That's ok, I think there's no problem with attending either of the two only, and catching up by video recordings and/or mail on the other. The qeustion is: Should that second event be developer-oriented or user-oriented? Or again both? Any comments here? Ok, that was a somewhat lengthy e-mail. Please make sure to provide any feedback you may have as early as possible, to increase the chances of your feedback being reflected in the planning. Happy hacking, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

1 0

git.osmocom.org cgit improvements
by Harald Welte 20 Mar '17

20 Mar '17

Hi all, today I've deployed some cgit improvements on https://git.osmocom.org/, in the hope that it makes this tool even more useful: 1) syntax highlighting of source code (requested by Hoernchen) The source code is now highlighted by pygments. I don't really understand why somebody would want to look at source code a lot in a browser, but well, it was as easy as to enable the existing pygments based filter plugin. 2) rendering of "about" page from README.md As you might have noticed, I've introduced a README.md in a number of repositoires, and cgit is now rendering an about page for every repository, e.g. at http://git.osmocom.org/libosmo-abis/about/ 3) gerrit change-ID hyperlink generation All gerrit Change-IDs in commit messages are now automatically converted to hyperlinks to the respective gerrit change, see e.g. the below example: http://git.osmocom.org/openbsc/commit/?id=6dd0fc685b7149f67a5fe17a5bce55c44… Please note that this works for the "Change-Id" line of the actual change, but also for change-ids in the free text (e.g. "this depends on change-id ... in libosmocore") 4) Osmocom ticket/issue hyperlink generation Any Line that matches the "^((Relate|Close|Fixe)[ds]):" prefix is scanned for occurrences of "OS#(\d+)" which are then amended with hyperlinks to the respective issue on osmocom.org Please note the OS# prefix is mandatory, so things like "OS#1614, 1615" will not work, as can be seen at http://git.osmocom.org/osmo-pcu/commit/?id=0a8fae8d141c2cfa4387ffe9b35402d5… Please format your commit messages accordingly. Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

3 3

RFC: OsmoDevCon 2017 planning
by Harald Welte 10 Dec '16

10 Dec '16

Dear Osmocom Community, [please respect the Reply-To and post all follow-up discussion to this to openbsc(a)lists.osmocom.org, so we avoid having long threads cross-posted to several mailing lists.] >From 2012 to 2016 we were running a series of small, invitation-only Osmocom Developer Conferences. Access was intentionally restricted to those community members who have demonstrated an existing track record of contribution to any of the projects under the Osmocom umbrella. This format of a small, tightly knit group of about 20 people has been successful over the years, and I have received a lot of positive feedback from past participants. On the other hand, the Osmocom project has grown in scope and diversity, and some of those projects don't have all that much relationship to each other - except being started by people from within the same group. There's the cellular communications (GSM/GPRS/EDGE/UMTS and hopefully at some point LTE) protocols which is attracting a lot of professional users. And then there's pure community projects like rtl-sdr, OsmocomBB, OsmocomGMR and many other efforts. Particularly the cellular infrastructure projects (OsmoBTS, OsmoPCU, OsmoBTS, OsmoNITB, OsmoSGSN, OpenGGSN, OsmoIuh & co) are somehow "standing out" of the othe projects in the context of having a wider user bsae, and in that user base also primarily commercial users. So I'd like to start a discussion on how to possibly change the event format to accomodate the various interests and parties. I definitely don't want to loose the "annual meeting of old friends" atmosphere, while at the same time also opening up to other interested parties. One idea would be to keep OsmoDevCon as-is and have a separate event where non-contributing/developing users / sysadmins / system integrators could also be attending. Another idea would be to split into a 'user day' and 'developer days' format. This is something the netfilter developer workshops have been using for many years, and from my limited insight quite successfully so. The "user day" is more like a traditional tech conference, with a large auditorium and talks oriented towards users / sysadmins / integrators of the software. The "developer days" are the invitation-only part, for known contributing developers only, similar to what we have at OsmoDevCon. Having both events (or both parts of an event) back-to-back has the advantage that a large number of potential speakers for the 'user day' are already present, and they don't have to travel yet another time. One could even structure it further and say we have one user day, one public 'Osmocom cellular developer day' and then the closed 'OsmoDevCon classic', maybe reduced from 4 days to 3 or even 2 days only? What is the general opinion about this? Are there people lurking on this list who would be interested in attending a public 'user day' or even 'developer day' about the Osmocom cellular projects, with presentations and workshops around topics such as running Osmocom based cellular networks? In terms of when/where, I would suggest to keep the tradition of April in Berlin/Germany. But I'm of course very happy if somebody wants to host it some place else... Regards, and looking forward to meeting you [again] in 2017, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

1 0

Moving from trac to a single redmine
by Holger Freyther 25 Sep '16

25 Sep '16

Hi guys, I think some of us would like to move to redmine and start using public tickets more frequently. So in case we move there are some topics to be discussed and I would like to start with a couple of them right now. Tickets: Redmine has a global linear sequence of ticket numbers. If we move from many tracs to a single redmine we can either: * not import tickets * only import from one project * deal with changing ticket numbers In terms of installations the GMR trac is broken in regard to tickets, there are some for SDR that are probably not being fixed anytime soon, baseband might be relevant and OpenBSC is unlikely to be relevant. I don't think we have ever used ticket reference in OpenBSC commit messages so in terms of OpenBSC having changing ticket numbers would not be a big deal. E.g. we could add a custom field with the old trac number? Wiki: We have external references that should be redirected to the new place. Is there any way besides maintaining a list in the apache2/nginx configuration and making redirects as we find broken references? Can we proactively manage this? Is anybody willing to come up with a script and nginx configuration for doing this? kind regards holger

6 14

Time to rename projects.osmocom.org to osmocom.org
by Holger Freyther 27 Mar '16

27 Mar '16

Hi, I think we all liked tnt's proposal to just call it osmocom.org. Are we ready to make the redmine available as osmocom.org (and redirect www.osmocom.org, projects.osmocom.org to it)? As first step of redirects I propose: http://bb.osmocom.org/ -> http://osmocom.org/projects/baseband http://openbsc.osmocom.org/ -> http://osmocom.org/projects/openbsc http://tetra.osmocom.org/ -> http://osmocom.org/projects/tetra http://simtrace.osmocom.org/ -> http://osmocom.org/projects/simtrace http://security.osmocom.org/ -> http://osmocom.org/projects/security http://gmr.osmocom.org/ -> http://osmocom.org/projects/gmr http://sdr.osmocom.org/ -> http://osmocom.org/projects/sdr any objections or corrections to that? kind regards holger

3 3

Progress of trac->redmine migration
by Holger Freyther 20 Feb '16

20 Feb '16

Hi all, I think we are close to the point of no return. All tickets and wikis have been imported. Please have a quick look if there is something obviously broken and if not I will proceed with post-processing and renaming tonight. kind regards holger

1 0

Fw: GMR software install
by Hanif Abd 04 Aug '15

04 Aug '15

dear all please help me for osmogmr_software installing at linux (ubuntu 14.04). I did all the steps of getting started link(http://gmr.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/GettingStarted) one by one but i can't install and run this software.plesae help me. Is it possible my ubuntu version was not suitable? if yes, which version is good?if it's possible send me true states for installation. bestHanif

1 0

Announcing OsmoDevCon 2015
by Harald Welte 13 Feb '15

13 Feb '15

Dear Osmocom.org project members, I'm happy to be able to announce the annual incarnation of OsmoDevCon. The Date is set for March 27 through 30. Venue: As usual, IN-Berlin e.V. in Berlin, Germany. Further details can be obtained from http://openbsc.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/OsmoDevCon2015 Attendance, as usual, is restricted to people with an active history in the Project by contributions in terms of code, patches, discussions, documentation or in other form. = Registration = If you have wiki access, please add yourself to the #Requested section. Alternatively, you can send me private e-mail about it. After review, your (nick)name will be listed in the #Confirmed section. Looking forward to meeting all of you again soon! -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

gmr