Attention is currently required from: laforge.
neels has posted comments on this change by neels. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/39744?usp=email )
Change subject: [4/6] personalization: refactor Pin, Adm
......................................................................
Patch Set 4:
(1 comment)
File pySim/esim/saip/personalization.py:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/39744/comment/6ef7717e_f3b9e05f?usp=em… :
PS3, Line 408: return (pe for pe in l if pe.type == wanted_type)
* I think from an ISO7816 and UICC point of view
it's sadly not correct to limit to MF. […]
This patch is trying to not modify
prior behavior.
The aim is to remove code dup between class Pin and class AppPin.
- Prior code happens to limit to MF for PIN1.
- Prior API happens to produce a mix of ProfileElementList and plain py lists.
If these prior conditions are wrong, I would like to fix them outside of this patch.
I created issue
https://osmocom.org/issues/6770 for the MF question.
and
https://osmocom.org/issues/6771 for the lists question.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/39744?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: pysim
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I54aef10b6d4309398d4b779a3740a7d706d68603
Gerrit-Change-Number: 39744
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 21:57:13 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>