Attention is currently required from: laforge. neels has posted comments on this change by neels. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/39744?usp=email ) Change subject: [4/6] personalization: refactor Pin, Adm ...................................................................... Patch Set 4: (1 comment) File pySim/esim/saip/personalization.py: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/39744/comment/6ef7717e_f3b9e05f?usp=ema... : PS3, Line 408: return (pe for pe in l if pe.type == wanted_type)
* I think from an ISO7816 and UICC point of view it's sadly not correct to limit to MF. […] This patch is trying to not modify prior behavior. The aim is to remove code dup between class Pin and class AppPin.
- Prior code happens to limit to MF for PIN1. - Prior API happens to produce a mix of ProfileElementList and plain py lists. If these prior conditions are wrong, I would like to fix them outside of this patch. I created issue https://osmocom.org/issues/6770 for the MF question. and https://osmocom.org/issues/6771 for the lists question. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/39744?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I54aef10b6d4309398d4b779a3740a7d706d68603 Gerrit-Change-Number: 39744 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge@osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge@osmocom.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 21:57:13 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr@sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge@osmocom.org>