Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27620 )
Change subject: abis_rsl: always check return value of rsl_tlv_parse()
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: -Code-Review
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS1:
Actually, this patch needs to be rebased on top of I63b64f1f241de3a76f9b66ed2cf524cc88933062.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/27620
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id022628934e7d51ce66cb255baa88f24bf5c918a
Gerrit-Change-Number: 27620
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 18:26:48 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: manawyrm, tnt.
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-e1d/+/27588 )
Change subject: OCTOI: initial support for E1oIP forwarding
......................................................................
Patch Set 5: Code-Review+2
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS5:
guess the patch is too large for review. As it only adds a lot of new code without changing much of the existing code paths for non-OCTOI, it should be rather safe to merge.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-e1d/+/27588
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-e1d
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I05f5ff697ca8f7dccdcf89660f12089babfcc92e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 27588
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: manawyrm <osmocom.account(a)tbspace.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: tnt <tnt(a)246tNt.com>
Gerrit-Attention: manawyrm <osmocom.account(a)tbspace.de>
Gerrit-Attention: tnt <tnt(a)246tNt.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:48:23 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
laforge has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/27621 )
Change subject: fix gsm_bts_get_cbch(): CBCH can be allocated on Cn
......................................................................
fix gsm_bts_get_cbch(): CBCH can be allocated on Cn
According to 3GPP TS 45.002, table 3, unlike the CCCH+SDCCH/4+CBCH
combination, which can only be allocated on C0/TS0, the SDCCH/8+CBCH
can be allocated on C0..n/TS0..3. In other words, having CBCH on
e.g. C1/TS2 is perfectly legal. This is why in gsm_bts_get_cbch()
we should check all transceivers, not just the C0.
Without this change osmo-bts does not send CBCH Load Indications
at all if the CBCH is allocated on C1..n.
Change-Id: Ib5976783b53521047fbdfc18e0e236e8bce8eaae
Related: osmo-bsc.git Ie79ccff4f8f0f1134757ec0c35e18b58081cc158
Related: SYS#5905
---
M src/common/bts.c
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Approvals:
Jenkins Builder: Verified
pespin: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve
laforge: Looks good to me, approved
diff --git a/src/common/bts.c b/src/common/bts.c
index 4e49c45..0608df1 100644
--- a/src/common/bts.c
+++ b/src/common/bts.c
@@ -883,22 +883,23 @@
/* return the gsm_lchan for the CBCH (if it exists at all) */
struct gsm_lchan *gsm_bts_get_cbch(struct gsm_bts *bts)
{
- struct gsm_lchan *lchan = NULL;
struct gsm_bts_trx *trx = bts->c0;
+ /* According to 3GPP TS 45.002, table 3, CBCH can be allocated
+ * either on C0/TS0 (CCCH+SDCCH4) or on C0..n/TS0..3 (SDCCH/8). */
if (trx->ts[0].pchan == GSM_PCHAN_CCCH_SDCCH4_CBCH)
- lchan = &trx->ts[0].lchan[2];
- else {
- int i;
- for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
- if (trx->ts[i].pchan == GSM_PCHAN_SDCCH8_SACCH8C_CBCH) {
- lchan = &trx->ts[i].lchan[2];
- break;
- }
+ return &trx->ts[0].lchan[2]; /* C0/TS0 */
+
+ llist_for_each_entry(trx, &bts->trx_list, list) { /* C0..n */
+ unsigned int tn;
+ for (tn = 0; tn <= 3; tn++) { /* TS0..3 */
+ struct gsm_bts_trx_ts *ts = &trx->ts[tn];
+ if (ts->pchan == GSM_PCHAN_SDCCH8_SACCH8C_CBCH)
+ return &ts->lchan[2];
}
}
- return lchan;
+ return NULL;
}
/* BCCH carrier power reduction (see 3GPP TS 45.008, section 7.1) */
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/27621
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib5976783b53521047fbdfc18e0e236e8bce8eaae
Gerrit-Change-Number: 27621
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
Attention is currently required from: fixeria.
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/27621 )
Change subject: fix gsm_bts_get_cbch(): CBCH can be allocated on Cn
......................................................................
Patch Set 3: Code-Review+2
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/27621
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib5976783b53521047fbdfc18e0e236e8bce8eaae
Gerrit-Change-Number: 27621
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:47:09 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment