- gerrit-log - lists.osmocom.org

[XS] Change in ...osmo-s1gw[master]: rebar.lock: bump exometer_report_statsd version
by fixeria 16 Mar '26

16 Mar '26

fixeria has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/42413?usp=email ) Change subject: rebar.lock: bump exometer_report_statsd version ...................................................................... rebar.lock: bump exometer_report_statsd version The new version is using ETS instead of dict for counter lookups. This significantly reduces performance impact when multiple eNBs are registered, since the ETS provides O(1) average-case hash lookups and in-place mutation. Change-Id: I931321a831215012aa8186d851d9a8d38908a4bf --- M rebar.lock 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/erlang/osmo-s1gw refs/changes/13/42413/1 diff --git a/rebar.lock b/rebar.lock index 1efe90b..439ea74 100644 --- a/rebar.lock +++ b/rebar.lock @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ 0}, {<<"exometer_report_statsd">>, {git,"https://github.com/osmocom/exometer_report_statsd.git", - {ref,"d35a98edf87996f2ab9ef0feda93b38677b0d063"}}, + {ref,"bfd6c095bfc404e5fab5c07f5ebe0fe305e58830"}}, 0}, {<<"hut">>,{pkg,<<"hut">>,<<"1.3.0">>},1}, {<<"jiffy">>, -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/42413?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: newchange Gerrit-Project: erlang/osmo-s1gw Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I931321a831215012aa8186d851d9a8d38908a4bf Gerrit-Change-Number: 42413 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[M] Change in osmo-trx[master]: transceiver: split control command handling from socket I/O
by pespin 16 Mar '26

16 Mar '26

Attention is currently required from: Timur Davydov. pespin has posted comments on this change by Timur Davydov. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42410?usp=email ) Change subject: transceiver: split control command handling from socket I/O ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: (1 comment) File Transceiver52M/Transceiver.cpp: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42410/comment/1868fef0_a0478afb?usp… : PS3, Line 1026: return -EINVAL; > The logic is preserved here. […] My point is that I don't see why do you decided to move the "return EINVAL here instead of 0 and decide to convert EINVAl to o 0 in other function" logic. I see no good reason to do that in this patch. If you consider that this path should return an error instead of 0 (which may be correct) then please submit a different patch changing this. It seems the diferentiation for this path returning non-error was made in 76ff96e21079db2cd7123ff9ca33fa7d2fb0cb01 (by me) but there's no real description on why was that, and I think we should indeed fail if timeslot reading fails. So please, if you want to change the logic, submit a patch before or after this one. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42410?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: osmo-trx Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I5413aa511e951522270c75635e89448395fc429e Gerrit-Change-Number: 42410 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: Timur Davydov <dtv.comp(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: Timur Davydov <dtv.comp(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 11:44:37 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: Timur Davydov <dtv.comp(a)gmail.com>

1 0

[M] Change in osmo-trx[master]: transceiver: split control command handling from socket I/O
by Timur Davydov 16 Mar '26

16 Mar '26

Attention is currently required from: pespin. Timur Davydov has posted comments on this change by Timur Davydov. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42410?usp=email ) Change subject: transceiver: split control command handling from socket I/O ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: (2 comments) File Transceiver52M/Transceiver.cpp: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42410/comment/c3610f30_6b28b2bd?usp… : PS3, Line 1026: return -EINVAL; > This logic change looks unrelated to this patch, please split into several patches. The logic is preserved here. The different return code is only used to distinguish this case from a normal `0` return value after the function was split. Previously this condition was handled in the same function, so there was no need to differentiate it. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42410/comment/43f6339a_bbd15495?usp… : PS3, Line 1091: return rc == -EINVAL ? 0 : rc; /* Ignore invalid values, but report other errors */ > This is a logic change, please split into separate patch. The logic is preserved here. Previously, when the timeslot was out of range, the function returned 0. After splitting the function, ctrl_cmd_handle() returns -EINVAL for that case, and ctrl_sock_handle_rx() converts it back to 0 to keep the original behavior. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42410?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: osmo-trx Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I5413aa511e951522270c75635e89448395fc429e Gerrit-Change-Number: 42410 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: Timur Davydov <dtv.comp(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 11:34:32 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[M] Change in libosmocore[master]: osmo_io: Rewrite iofd_handle_send_completion() to fix multiple issues
by pespin 16 Mar '26

16 Mar '26

pespin has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/42354?usp=email ) Change subject: osmo_io: Rewrite iofd_handle_send_completion() to fix multiple issues ...................................................................... osmo_io: Rewrite iofd_handle_send_completion() to fix multiple issues Previous implementation had multiple issues, which this patch addresses: * Didn't call user cb updating completed bytes for a given msg which had a partial write. * rc checks against "Incomplete write" were wrong, because rc was not being decremented with previous msgs idxs being processed. * Didn't take into account the write(0, fd, buf) = 0 valid user case for regular files. The rewrite also simplifies the logic by splitting the "rc < 0" (error) paths from the "rc >= 0" (successful) paths. Related: SYS#7842 Change-Id: Ia016e4df7be5e534a8212f7271caff9779e08eb1 --- M src/core/osmo_io.c 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) Approvals: Jenkins Builder: Verified osmith: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve jolly: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve pespin: Looks good to me, approved diff --git a/src/core/osmo_io.c b/src/core/osmo_io.c index 7c59a61..2a20405 100644 --- a/src/core/osmo_io.c +++ b/src/core/osmo_io.c @@ -509,6 +509,26 @@ } } +static void iofd_send_completion_cb(struct osmo_io_fd *iofd, int rc, const struct iofd_msghdr *msghdr, struct msgb *msg) +{ + switch (msghdr->action) { + case IOFD_ACT_WRITE: + if (iofd->io_ops.write_cb) + iofd->io_ops.write_cb(iofd, rc, msg); + break; + case IOFD_ACT_SENDTO: + if (iofd->io_ops.sendto_cb) + iofd->io_ops.sendto_cb(iofd, rc, msg, &msghdr->osa); + break; + case IOFD_ACT_SENDMSG: + if (iofd->io_ops.sendmsg_cb) + iofd->io_ops.sendmsg_cb(iofd, rc, msg); + break; + default: + OSMO_ASSERT(0); + } +} + /*! completion handler: Internal function called by osmo_io_backend after a given I/O operation has completed * \param[in] iofd I/O file-descriptor on which I/O has completed * \param[in] rc return value of the I/O operation @@ -518,18 +538,45 @@ { int idx, i; - /* Re-enqueue the complete msgb. */ - if (rc == -EAGAIN) { - iofd_txqueue_enqueue_front(iofd, msghdr); + if (OSMO_UNLIKELY(rc < 0)) { + /* Re-enqueue the complete msgb. */ + if (rc == -EAGAIN) { + iofd_txqueue_enqueue_front(iofd, msghdr); + return; + } + + /* Propagate error for all msgbs to user cb: */ + for (idx = 0; idx < msghdr->io_len; idx++) { + iofd_send_completion_cb(iofd, rc, msghdr, msghdr->msg[idx]); + msgb_free(msghdr->msg[idx]); + msghdr->msg[idx] = NULL; + + /* The user can unregister/close the iofd during callback above. */ + if (!IOFD_FLAG_ISSET(iofd, IOFD_FLAG_FD_REGISTERED)) + break; + } + iofd_msghdr_free(msghdr); return; } for (idx = 0; idx < msghdr->io_len; idx++) { struct msgb *msg = msghdr->msg[idx]; - int chunk; + int chunk = OSMO_MIN(rc, msgb_length(msg)); + /* chunk contains write completed bytes of msg */ - /* Incomplete write */ - if (rc > 0 && rc < msgb_length(msg)) { + /* If "rc == 0 and msgb_length(msg) > 0", then we had a partial + * write where OS wrote up to exact start point of current msg. + * In that case, we want to skip notifying the user and continue + * below on the "Incomplete write" path to delay further writing. + * If "rc == 0 and msgb_length(msg) == 0", the user specifically + * requested a write() of 0 bytes and 0 can be returned, which + * has its use cases for regular files. In that case user is + * interested in receiving a cb. */ + if (OSMO_LIKELY(!(rc == 0 && msgb_length(msg) > 0))) + iofd_send_completion_cb(iofd, chunk, msghdr, msg); + + /* Incomplete write: */ + if (chunk < msgb_length(msg)) { /* Keep msg with unsent data only. */ msgb_pull(msg, rc); msghdr->iov[idx].iov_len = msgb_length(msg); @@ -551,35 +598,12 @@ return; } - if (rc >= 0) { - chunk = msgb_length(msg); - if (rc < chunk) - chunk = rc; - } else { - chunk = rc; - } - - /* All other failure and success cases are handled here */ - switch (msghdr->action) { - case IOFD_ACT_WRITE: - if (iofd->io_ops.write_cb) - iofd->io_ops.write_cb(iofd, chunk, msg); - break; - case IOFD_ACT_SENDTO: - if (iofd->io_ops.sendto_cb) - iofd->io_ops.sendto_cb(iofd, chunk, msg, &msghdr->osa); - break; - case IOFD_ACT_SENDMSG: - if (iofd->io_ops.sendmsg_cb) - iofd->io_ops.sendmsg_cb(iofd, chunk, msg); - break; - default: - OSMO_ASSERT(0); - } - msgb_free(msghdr->msg[idx]); msghdr->msg[idx] = NULL; + /* At least current msg (idx) was written, maybe more: rc >= chunk */ + rc -= chunk; + /* The user can unregister/close the iofd during callback above. */ if (!IOFD_FLAG_ISSET(iofd, IOFD_FLAG_FD_REGISTERED)) break; -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/42354?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: merged Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia016e4df7be5e534a8212f7271caff9779e08eb1 Gerrit-Change-Number: 42354 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[S] Change in libosmocore[master]: osmo_io: Fix msgb memleak if iofd is unregistered during write_cb wit...
by pespin 16 Mar '26

16 Mar '26

pespin has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/42412?usp=email ) Change subject: osmo_io: Fix msgb memleak if iofd is unregistered during write_cb with >1 io buffers ...................................................................... osmo_io: Fix msgb memleak if iofd is unregistered during write_cb with >1 io buffers The msgbs are not allocated under the msghdr, hence if user unregistered the iofd we need to manually free all remaining msgbs when freeing the msghdr. Change-Id: I579bc2142bba02947021c47d94bf2fe4f2040b01 --- M src/core/osmo_io.c 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Approvals: Jenkins Builder: Verified pespin: Looks good to me, approved osmith: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve fixeria: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve jolly: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve diff --git a/src/core/osmo_io.c b/src/core/osmo_io.c index 2a20405..ddf77ec 100644 --- a/src/core/osmo_io.c +++ b/src/core/osmo_io.c @@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ /* The user can unregister/close the iofd during callback above. */ if (!IOFD_FLAG_ISSET(iofd, IOFD_FLAG_FD_REGISTERED)) - break; + goto free_remaining_idx; } iofd_msghdr_free(msghdr); return; @@ -606,9 +606,18 @@ /* The user can unregister/close the iofd during callback above. */ if (!IOFD_FLAG_ISSET(iofd, IOFD_FLAG_FD_REGISTERED)) - break; + goto free_remaining_idx; } iofd_msghdr_free(msghdr); + return; + +free_remaining_idx: + for (idx = idx + 1; idx < msghdr->io_len; idx++) { + msgb_free(msghdr->msg[idx]); + msghdr->msg[idx] = NULL; + } + iofd_msghdr_free(msghdr); + return; } /* Public functions */ -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/42412?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: merged Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I579bc2142bba02947021c47d94bf2fe4f2040b01 Gerrit-Change-Number: 42412 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[S] Change in libosmocore[master]: osmo_io: Fix msgb memleak if iofd is unregistered during write_cb wit...
by pespin 16 Mar '26

16 Mar '26

Attention is currently required from: daniel, laforge. pespin has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/42412?usp=email ) Change subject: osmo_io: Fix msgb memleak if iofd is unregistered during write_cb with >1 io buffers ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/42412?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I579bc2142bba02947021c47d94bf2fe4f2040b01 Gerrit-Change-Number: 42412 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 11:27:15 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes

1 0

[M] Change in libosmocore[master]: osmo_io: Rewrite iofd_handle_send_completion() to fix multiple issues
by pespin 16 Mar '26

16 Mar '26

Attention is currently required from: daniel, fixeria, laforge. pespin has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/42354?usp=email ) Change subject: osmo_io: Rewrite iofd_handle_send_completion() to fix multiple issues ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/42354?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia016e4df7be5e534a8212f7271caff9779e08eb1 Gerrit-Change-Number: 42354 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 11:27:14 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes

1 0

[L] Change in osmo-trx[master]: device/websdr: add WebSDR transceiver backend and build target
by Timur Davydov 16 Mar '26

16 Mar '26

Attention is currently required from: pespin. Timur Davydov has posted comments on this change by Timur Davydov. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42411?usp=email ) Change subject: device/websdr: add WebSDR transceiver backend and build target ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: (1 comment) File Transceiver52M/device/websdr/TransceiverWebSdr.cpp: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42411/comment/9d598a47_8a816d3b?usp… : PS3, Line 50: : Transceiver(cfg, wTransmitLatency, wRadioInterface) > I'm not really liking the patch. […] Thanks for the feedback. My intention was mainly to group everything related to the WebSDR backend into a separate directory. However, you are right that this approach does not fit well with the existing device backend structure. It makes more sense to move this code into Transceiver52 instead. In fact, in this case I don't really need a radioDevice subclass implementation, so the current layout under device/ is not appropriate. I'll rework the patch accordingly. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42411?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: osmo-trx Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia0d340c323c2eea28fbe82601ba0af7cfbd68f6d Gerrit-Change-Number: 42411 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: Timur Davydov <dtv.comp(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 11:06:09 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[S] Change in ...osmo-s1gw[master]: mme_registry: add backwards compat for old sctp_client config
by pespin 16 Mar '26

16 Mar '26

Attention is currently required from: fixeria. pespin has posted comments on this change by fixeria. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/42352?usp=email ) Change subject: mme_registry: add backwards compat for old sctp_client config ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/42352?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: erlang/osmo-s1gw Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia97fb61bbb5ace6f43d1a6768fb5fb6883158532 Gerrit-Change-Number: 42352 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 10:58:42 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes

1 0

[M] Change in osmo-trx[master]: transceiver: split control command handling from socket I/O
by pespin 16 Mar '26

16 Mar '26

Attention is currently required from: Timur Davydov. pespin has posted comments on this change by Timur Davydov. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42410?usp=email ) Change subject: transceiver: split control command handling from socket I/O ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: (1 comment) File Transceiver52M/Transceiver.h: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42410/comment/26cb7e84_4d8f0a9e?usp… : PS3, Line 220: int ctrl_cmd_handle(int chan, const char *buffer, char *response, size_t response_size); > The file uses 2-space indentation, but when using 2 spaces Jenkins fails the build. […] It's fine if CI fails in this file, we wan overwrite it manually. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/42410?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: osmo-trx Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I5413aa511e951522270c75635e89448395fc429e Gerrit-Change-Number: 42410 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: Timur Davydov <dtv.comp(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: Timur Davydov <dtv.comp(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 10:58:14 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: Timur Davydov <dtv.comp(a)gmail.com>

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

gerrit-log