December 2025 - gerrit-log - lists.osmocom.org

[S] Change in pysim[master]: pySim.esim.saip.personalization: Support Milenage customization
by laforge 19 Dec '25

19 Dec '25

laforge has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41690?usp=email ) Change subject: pySim.esim.saip.personalization: Support Milenage customization ...................................................................... pySim.esim.saip.personalization: Support Milenage customization Milenage offers the capability for operators to modify the r1-r5 rotation constants as well as the c1-c5 xor-ing constants; let's add ConfigurableParameters for that. Change-Id: I397df6c0c708a8061e4adc0fde03a3f746bcb5b6 Related: SYS#7787 --- M pySim/esim/saip/personalization.py 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Approvals: laforge: Looks good to me, approved fixeria: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve Jenkins Builder: Verified diff --git a/pySim/esim/saip/personalization.py b/pySim/esim/saip/personalization.py index 053ea0c..71f115d 100644 --- a/pySim/esim/saip/personalization.py +++ b/pySim/esim/saip/personalization.py @@ -322,3 +322,37 @@ if self.input_value not in [1, 2, 3]: raise ValueError('Invalid algorithmID %s' % (self.input_value)) self.value = self.input_value +class MilenageRotationConstants(AlgoConfig, key='rotationConstants'): + """rotation constants r1,r2,r3,r4,r5 of Milenage, Range 0..127. See 3GPP TS 35.206 Sections 2.3 + 5.3. + Provided as octet-string concatenation of all 5 constants. Expects a bytes-like object of length 5, with + each byte in the range of 0..127. The default value by 3GPP is '4000204060' (hex notation)""" + def validate(self): + super().validate() + if len(self.input_value) != 5: + raise ValueError('Length of value must be 5 octets') + for r in self.input_value: + if r > 127: + raise ValueError('r values must be between 0 and 127') +class MilenageXoringConstants(AlgoConfig, key='xoringConstants'): + """XOR-ing constants c1,c2,c3,c4,c5 of Milenage, 128bit each. See 3GPP TS 35.206 Sections 2.3 + 5.3. + Provided as octet-string concatenation of all 5 constants. The default value by 3GPP is the concetenation + of: + 00000000000000000000000000000000 + 00000000000000000000000000000001 + 00000000000000000000000000000002 + 00000000000000000000000000000004 + 00000000000000000000000000000008 + """ + def validate(self): + super().validate() + if len(self.input_value) != 80: + raise ValueError('Length of value must be 80 octets') +class TuakNumberOfKeccak(AlgoConfig, key='numberOfKeccak'): + """Number of iterations of Keccak-f[1600] permuitation as recomended by Section 7.2 of 3GPP TS 35.231. + The default value by 3GPP is 1.""" + def validate(self): + if not isinstance(self.input_value, int): + raise ValueError('Value must be an integer') + if self.input_value < 1 or self.input_value > 255: + raise ValueError('Value must be an integer between 1 and 255') + self.value = self.input_value -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41690?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: merged Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I397df6c0c708a8061e4adc0fde03a3f746bcb5b6 Gerrit-Change-Number: 41690 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[XS] Change in pysim[master]: pyshark_gsmtap: Adjust display filter for some wireshark versions
by laforge 19 Dec '25

19 Dec '25

laforge has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41712?usp=email ) Change subject: pyshark_gsmtap: Adjust display filter for some wireshark versions ...................................................................... pyshark_gsmtap: Adjust display filter for some wireshark versions On my debian unstable system with wireshark 4.6.2-3, the pyshark_gsmtap APDU source misses to report any ATRs, as those are not part of what's reported with the 'gsm_sim' display filter. This is due to wireshark.git commit bcd82e2370d18e20983b378d494964d89c191cef first part of the 4.6.0 release, which splits the ATR dissection into a separate sub-dissector. We cannot use the seemingly logical 'gsmtap.type == 4' instead, as old wireshark simply bypasses any output for the gsmtap header if the SIM sub-dissector is used. Hence, 'gsm_sim || iso7816.atr' is something compatible with older and newer wireshark versions. Change-Id: I53c1c8ed58a82c37cd4be4af3890af21da839e86 --- M pySim/apdu_source/pyshark_gsmtap.py 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Approvals: laforge: Looks good to me, approved Jenkins Builder: Verified fixeria: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve diff --git a/pySim/apdu_source/pyshark_gsmtap.py b/pySim/apdu_source/pyshark_gsmtap.py index e8f5d18..13562d9 100644 --- a/pySim/apdu_source/pyshark_gsmtap.py +++ b/pySim/apdu_source/pyshark_gsmtap.py @@ -84,5 +84,5 @@ Args: pcap_filename: File name of the pcap file to be opened """ - pyshark_inst = pyshark.FileCapture(pcap_filename, display_filter='gsm_sim', use_json=True, keep_packets=False) + pyshark_inst = pyshark.FileCapture(pcap_filename, display_filter='gsm_sim || iso7816.atr', use_json=True, keep_packets=False) super().__init__(pyshark_inst) -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41712?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: merged Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I53c1c8ed58a82c37cd4be4af3890af21da839e86 Gerrit-Change-Number: 41712 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[S] Change in pysim[master]: ts_51_011/EF.SMSP: Fix parsing of parameter_indicators
by laforge 19 Dec '25

19 Dec '25

laforge has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41674?usp=email ) Change subject: ts_51_011/EF.SMSP: Fix parsing of parameter_indicators ...................................................................... ts_51_011/EF.SMSP: Fix parsing of parameter_indicators There's a 3-bit RFU field that (unlike everything else in USIM/UICC) considers '1' to be the default. Let's make sure we get that right during encode. Change-Id: Ibe24a07f5f73d875d2077fa55471dbfc4e90da23 --- M pySim/ts_51_011.py M tests/pySim-trace_test/pySim-trace_test_gsmtap.pcapng.ok 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Approvals: Jenkins Builder: Verified fixeria: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve dexter: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve laforge: Looks good to me, approved diff --git a/pySim/ts_51_011.py b/pySim/ts_51_011.py index 7532ba4..6e3f5e9 100644 --- a/pySim/ts_51_011.py +++ b/pySim/ts_51_011.py @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ _test_decode = [ ( '454e6574776f726b73fffffffffffffff1ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff0000a7', { "alpha_id": "ENetworks", "parameter_indicators": { "tp_dest_addr": False, "tp_sc_addr": True, - "tp_pid": True, "tp_dcs": True, "tp_vp": True }, + "tp_pid": True, "tp_dcs": True, "tp_vp": False }, "tp_dest_addr": { "length": 255, "ton_npi": { "ext": True, "type_of_number": "reserved_for_extension", "numbering_plan_id": "reserved_for_extension" }, "call_number": "" }, @@ -281,8 +281,13 @@ super().__init__(fid, sfid=sfid, name=name, desc=desc, rec_len=(28, None), **kwargs) ScAddr = Struct('length'/Int8ub, 'ton_npi'/TonNpi, 'call_number'/BcdAdapter(Rpad(Bytes(10)))) self._construct = Struct('alpha_id'/COptional(GsmOrUcs2Adapter(Rpad(Bytes(this._.total_len-28)))), - 'parameter_indicators'/InvertAdapter(FlagsEnum(Byte, tp_dest_addr=1, tp_sc_addr=2, - tp_pid=3, tp_dcs=4, tp_vp=5)), + 'parameter_indicators'/InvertAdapter(BitStruct( + Const(7, BitsInteger(3)), + 'tp_vp'/Flag, + 'tp_dcs'/Flag, + 'tp_pid'/Flag, + 'tp_sc_addr'/Flag, + 'tp_dest_addr'/Flag)), 'tp_dest_addr'/ScAddr, 'tp_sc_addr'/ScAddr, diff --git a/tests/pySim-trace_test/pySim-trace_test_gsmtap.pcapng.ok b/tests/pySim-trace_test/pySim-trace_test_gsmtap.pcapng.ok index 423f25e..49b28bd 100644 --- a/tests/pySim-trace_test/pySim-trace_test_gsmtap.pcapng.ok +++ b/tests/pySim-trace_test/pySim-trace_test_gsmtap.pcapng.ok @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ =============================== 00 SEARCH RECORD MF/ADF.USIM/EF.SMSP 01 9000 {"cmd": {"file": "currently_selected_ef", "mode": "forward_search", "record_number": 1, "search_string": "ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff"}, "rsp": {"body": [2], "sw": "9000"}} =============================== -00 READ RECORD MF/ADF.USIM/EF.SMSP 01 9000 {"alpha_id": "", "parameter_indicators": {"tp_dest_addr": false, "tp_sc_addr": true, "tp_pid": true, "tp_dcs": true, "tp_vp": true}, "tp_dest_addr": {"length": 255, "ton_npi": {"ext": true, "type_of_number": "reserved_for_extension", "numbering_plan_id": "reserved_for_extension"}, "call_number": ""}, "tp_sc_addr": {"length": 5, "ton_npi": {"ext": true, "type_of_number": "unknown", "numbering_plan_id": "isdn_e164"}, "call_number": "0015555f"}, "tp_pid": "00", "tp_dcs": "00", "tp_vp_minutes": 5} +00 READ RECORD MF/ADF.USIM/EF.SMSP 01 9000 {"alpha_id": "", "parameter_indicators": {"tp_vp": true, "tp_dcs": true, "tp_pid": true, "tp_sc_addr": true, "tp_dest_addr": false}, "tp_dest_addr": {"length": 255, "ton_npi": {"ext": true, "type_of_number": "reserved_for_extension", "numbering_plan_id": "reserved_for_extension"}, "call_number": ""}, "tp_sc_addr": {"length": 5, "ton_npi": {"ext": true, "type_of_number": "unknown", "numbering_plan_id": "isdn_e164"}, "call_number": "0015555f"}, "tp_pid": "00", "tp_dcs": "00", "tp_vp_minutes": 5} =============================== 00 SEARCH RECORD MF/ADF.USIM/EF.SMS 01 9000 {"cmd": {"file": "currently_selected_ef", "mode": "forward_search", "record_number": 1, "search_string": "00ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff"}, "rsp": {"body": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30], "sw": "9000"}} =============================== -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41674?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: merged Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ibe24a07f5f73d875d2077fa55471dbfc4e90da23 Gerrit-Change-Number: 41674 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>

1 0

[XS] Change in pysim[master]: unittest/test_files.TransparentEF_Test: Actually test encoder
by laforge 19 Dec '25

19 Dec '25

laforge has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41675?usp=email ) Change subject: unittest/test_files.TransparentEF_Test: Actually test encoder ...................................................................... unittest/test_files.TransparentEF_Test: Actually test encoder In the test_encode_file() method, we should actually test the encoder, and not the decoder. I suppose this was a copy+paste mistake at some point? In the LinearFixedEF_Test.test_encoder_record we were already testing the encoder. Just TransparentEF_Test got it wrong... Change-Id: Id23305a78ab9acd2e006f2b26b72408795844d23 --- M tests/unittests/test_files.py 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Approvals: fixeria: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve laforge: Looks good to me, approved Jenkins Builder: Verified diff --git a/tests/unittests/test_files.py b/tests/unittests/test_files.py index a3ccf06..ab70771 100755 --- a/tests/unittests/test_files.py +++ b/tests/unittests/test_files.py @@ -256,8 +256,8 @@ encoded = t[0] decoded = t[1] logging.debug("Testing encode of %s", name) - re_dec = inst.decode_hex(encoded) - self.assertEqual(decoded, re_dec) + re_enc = inst.encode_hex(decoded) + self.assertEqual(encoded, re_enc) def test_de_encode_file(self): """Test the decoder and encoder for a transparent EF. Performs first a decoder -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41675?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: merged Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Id23305a78ab9acd2e006f2b26b72408795844d23 Gerrit-Change-Number: 41675 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>

1 0

[S] Change in pysim[master]: unittests/test_files: Pass to-be-encoded length to encoder functions
by laforge 19 Dec '25

19 Dec '25

laforge has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41676?usp=email ) Change subject: unittests/test_files: Pass to-be-encoded length to encoder functions ...................................................................... unittests/test_files: Pass to-be-encoded length to encoder functions Some of the encoders can only generate valid output if they are told the expected output size. This is due to variable-length fields that depend on the size of the total record (or file). Let's always pass the expected length to the encoder methods. Change-Id: I88f957e49b0c88a121a266d3582e79822fa0e214 --- M tests/unittests/test_files.py 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Approvals: laforge: Looks good to me, approved dexter: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve Jenkins Builder: Verified fixeria: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve diff --git a/tests/unittests/test_files.py b/tests/unittests/test_files.py index ab70771..5bbbddd 100755 --- a/tests/unittests/test_files.py +++ b/tests/unittests/test_files.py @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ inst = c() encoded, rec_num, decoded = self._parse_t(t) logging.debug("Testing encode of %s", name) - re_enc = inst.encode_record_hex(decoded, rec_num) + re_enc = inst.encode_record_hex(decoded, rec_num, len(encoded)//2) self.assertEqual(encoded.upper(), re_enc.upper()) def test_de_encode_record(self): @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ self.assertEqual(decoded, re_dec) # re-encode the decoded data logging.debug("Testing re-encode of %s", name) - re_enc = inst.encode_record_hex(re_dec, rec_num) + re_enc = inst.encode_record_hex(re_dec, rec_num, len(encoded)//2) self.assertEqual(encoded.upper(), re_enc.upper()) if hasattr(c, '_test_no_pad') and c._test_no_pad: continue @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ self.assertEqual(decoded, re_dec) # re-encode the decoded data logging.debug("Testing re-encode of %s", name) - re_enc = inst.encode_record_hex(re_dec) + re_enc = inst.encode_record_hex(re_dec, len(encoded)//2) self.assertEqual(encoded.upper(), re_enc.upper()) # there's no point in testing padded input, as TransRecEF have a fixed record # size and we cannot ever receive more input data than that size. @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ encoded = t[0] decoded = t[1] logging.debug("Testing encode of %s", name) - re_enc = inst.encode_hex(decoded) + re_enc = inst.encode_hex(decoded, len(encoded)//2) self.assertEqual(encoded, re_enc) def test_de_encode_file(self): @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ self.assertEqual(decoded, re_dec) logging.debug("Testing re-encode of %s", name) re_dec = inst.decode_hex(encoded) - re_enc = inst.encode_hex(re_dec) + re_enc = inst.encode_hex(re_dec, len(encoded)//2) self.assertEqual(encoded.upper(), re_enc.upper()) if hasattr(c, '_test_no_pad') and c._test_no_pad: continue -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41676?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: merged Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I88f957e49b0c88a121a266d3582e79822fa0e214 Gerrit-Change-Number: 41676 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>

1 0

[S] Change in pysim[master]: unittests/test_files: Pass to-be-encoded length to encoder functions
by laforge 19 Dec '25

19 Dec '25

laforge has posted comments on this change by laforge. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41676?usp=email ) Change subject: unittests/test_files: Pass to-be-encoded length to encoder functions ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41676?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I88f957e49b0c88a121a266d3582e79822fa0e214 Gerrit-Change-Number: 41676 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 10:54:57 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes

1 0

[XS] Change in pysim[master]: unittest/test_files.TransparentEF_Test: Actually test encoder
by laforge 19 Dec '25

19 Dec '25

Attention is currently required from: dexter. laforge has posted comments on this change by laforge. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41675?usp=email ) Change subject: unittest/test_files.TransparentEF_Test: Actually test encoder ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41675?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Id23305a78ab9acd2e006f2b26b72408795844d23 Gerrit-Change-Number: 41675 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 10:54:55 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes

1 0

[S] Change in pysim[master]: ts_51_011/EF.SMSP: Fix parsing of parameter_indicators
by laforge 19 Dec '25

19 Dec '25

Attention is currently required from: neels. laforge has posted comments on this change by laforge. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41674?usp=email ) Change subject: ts_51_011/EF.SMSP: Fix parsing of parameter_indicators ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41674?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ibe24a07f5f73d875d2077fa55471dbfc4e90da23 Gerrit-Change-Number: 41674 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 10:54:49 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes

1 0

[XS] Change in pysim[master]: pyshark_gsmtap: Adjust display filter for some wireshark versions
by laforge 19 Dec '25

19 Dec '25

Attention is currently required from: dexter. laforge has posted comments on this change by laforge. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41712?usp=email ) Change subject: pyshark_gsmtap: Adjust display filter for some wireshark versions ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41712?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I53c1c8ed58a82c37cd4be4af3890af21da839e86 Gerrit-Change-Number: 41712 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 10:54:47 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes

1 0

[S] Change in pysim[master]: pySim.esim.saip.personalization: Support Milenage customization
by laforge 19 Dec '25

19 Dec '25

Attention is currently required from: dexter, neels. laforge has posted comments on this change by laforge. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41690?usp=email ) Change subject: pySim.esim.saip.personalization: Support Milenage customization ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/41690?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I397df6c0c708a8061e4adc0fde03a3f746bcb5b6 Gerrit-Change-Number: 41690 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 10:54:45 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes

1 0