Hi Sylvain, Thanks for posting it to the list, I just hit reply, I thought the list is the main "to" part of the reply, but now I know, I have to put reply-all instead.
What I am using GR is use the AIR interface of the TETRA in a simple way, I would like to create a system similar to OpenBTS to handle TETRA. The main problem I have is I am a pure HW design engineer and my knowledge of Linux, Python and high level SW is not very strong, but I am learning.
Best regards, Farhad
________________________________ From: Sylvain Munaut 246tnt@gmail.com To: Farhad Abdolian f.abdolian@yahoo.com Cc: tetra@lists.osmocom.org Sent: Thu, January 27, 2011 11:08:52 AM Subject: Re: TETRA and GRC?
[snip] ... but wondered if anyone had worked on the GR porting of the code. I assume, that is not the case.
No that I know of.
What would be the interest exactly ?
I mean GR is great for signal processing but once you got the bits, the rest is IMHO way better handled outside gnuradio itself. All the phy/mac levels are no trivial and will need state processing and such ... not something I really see in GR.
Using fifo on the filesystem you can pipe directly/live the flow of info from GR outpout to the tetra-rx input.
Cheers,
Sylvain
BTW, you forgot to CC the list in your reply. (I assume it was your intent because of the "with everyone here" comment at the end of your mail).