Attention is currently required from: pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30619 )
Change subject: pdch: Introduce APIs to print PDCH name
......................................................................
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+1
(3 comments)
File src/pdch.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30619/comment/49026ac4_4fd3be33
PS1, Line 195: unsigned int
size_t?
Done
File src/pdch.cpp:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30619/comment/55e21f85_62168255
PS1, Line 1339:
" No newline at end of revision file. […]
Done
File src/pdch.cpp:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30619/comment/bf1b6ae5_6d352d9d
PS2, Line 1346: pdch_name_buf
I still think it makes sense to do NULL checking here. We had a similar discussion when
Neels was refactoring osmo-{bsc,msc} and in the end after a few segfaults we agreed that
doing NULL checking is better.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30619
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If18cb4a48237751e0dddede6793191b36dfe386d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30619
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 11:39:27 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment