Attention is currently required from: pespin. neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/28818 )

Change subject: hnbgw: test PS RAB GTP mapping ......................................................................

Patch Set 2:

(2 comments)

File hnbgw/HNBGW_Tests.ttcn:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/28818/comment/536cb845_9ed7b... PS1, Line 285: pfcp_remote_ip := "127.0.0.2",

this probably needs to be moved to a mp_pfcp_ip_remote

technically the ttcn3 virt UPF should respond back to whichever IP sends PFCP requests, i think i left it like this because it felt not properly thought through yet. does it make sense to set a fixed mp_pfcp_ip_remote? makes the PFCP emulation code simpler. we always have one fixed SUT. so i guess it makes sense.

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/28818/comment/94029f0d_1fd99... PS1, Line 1308: f_sleep(2.0);

is this sleep needed?

i guess i wanted to "simulate" that the RAB remains in use for a bit of time. sometimes nicer to have a time delay at such places to help reading logs / traces