Attention is currently required from: pespin.
2 comments:
File hnbgw/HNBGW_Tests.ttcn:
Patch Set #1, Line 285: pfcp_remote_ip := "127.0.0.2",
this probably needs to be moved to a mp_pfcp_ip_remote
technically the ttcn3 virt UPF should respond back to whichever IP sends PFCP requests, i think i left it like this because it felt not properly thought through yet.
does it make sense to set a fixed mp_pfcp_ip_remote? makes the PFCP emulation code simpler. we always have one fixed SUT. so i guess it makes sense.
Patch Set #1, Line 1308: f_sleep(2.0);
is this sleep needed?
i guess i wanted to "simulate" that the RAB remains in use for a bit of time. sometimes nicer to have a time delay at such places to help reading logs / traces
To view, visit change 28818. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.