Attention is currently required from: fixeria.
pespin has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30216
)
Change subject: tbf_fsm: Move osmo_fsm_inst fi out of struct tbf_fsm_ctx
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File src/tbf.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30216/comment/fcf20b82_5d57f633
PS1, Line 260: state_fi
But this is one is the main tbf_fsm, right? Both
ul_ass_fsm and dl_ass_fsm are supplementary ones, A […]
It's not the
"main" tbf, it's the "state" tbf as its name indicates.
I can rename "state_fsm" as "state_fsm_ctx" if you want, in a separate
follow-up commit.
Why allocating the context dynamically if it can be allocated as part of the tbf struct?
there's no need for that.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30216
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I03e691ccf6a94431caa55653349158f5b85db017
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30216
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 15:36:46 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment