Attention is currently required from: Hoernchen, fixeria. pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/30416 )
Change subject: ms-trx support ......................................................................
Patch Set 11:
(8 comments)
File Transceiver52M/Makefile.am:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/30416/comment/668bb158_0fd429d4 PS11, Line 88: grgsm_vitac/grgsm_vitac.cpp \ is this only to be used in ms-trx? why not moving it to subdir ms/grgsm_vita/ then?
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/30416/comment/8630fe58_37c98796 PS11, Line 179: osmo_trx_syncthing_blade_CPPFLAGS = $(AM_CPPFLAGS) $(BLADE_CFLAGS) -DSYNCTHINGONLY -DBUILDBLADE -I../device/ipc $(top_srcdir)/Transceiver52/device/ipc? not sure if it's a good idea to use relative paths there.
File Transceiver52M/ms/itrq.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/30416/comment/c07c1582_ff3c8410 PS11, Line 127: class spsc : public T<block_read, block_write> { didn't we have an implementation of this somewhere else already?
File Transceiver52M/ms/logging.cpp:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/30416/comment/c8ac01e1_c8a07cda PS11, Line 83: void trxc_log_init(void *tallctx) shouldn't this be called "trxcon_log_init"?
File Transceiver52M/ms/ms.cpp:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/30416/comment/5f3dd3ea_e636957f PS11, Line 312: // in thory fn equal and tn+3 equal is also a problem... theory
File Transceiver52M/ms/ms_upper.cpp:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/30416/comment/b1f9d86c_bdff35ed PS11, Line 297: case trxcon::TRXCON_PHYIF_CMDT_RESET: value_string?
File Transceiver52M/ms/sch.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/30416/comment/fb6d243a_f13769d2 PS11, Line 7: * (C) 2022 by 2022 by sysmocom s.f.m.c. GmbH info@sysmocom.de / Eric Wild ewild@sysmocom.de repeated "2022 by"
File Transceiver52M/ms/sch.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/30416/comment/6e3cc067_359daed9 PS11, Line 97: int gsm_fcch_check_fn(int fn) don't we have these sort of functionalities already in libosmocore?