Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30566 )
Change subject: Move first_common_ts from gprs_rlcmac_tbf to GprsMs
......................................................................
Patch Set 3: Code-Review+1
(3 comments)
File src/gprs_ms.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30566/comment/b1647104_20d85087
PS2, Line 67: simultaniously
Yes, I simply moved the comment. I can change the
description as you suggest though.
Done
File src/pcu_vty_functions.cpp:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30566/comment/70152e90_b2b96b58
PS2, Line 64: PRId8
what's wrong with using the proper type for the
variable? […]
I am not saying it's wrong, I was wondering why it's really
needed here. I see you're not only moving a field from one struct to another, but also
changing it from unsigned to signed. And %d we already have here would still work fine for
signed. In any case, not a merge blocker.
File src/pcu_vty_functions.cpp:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30566/comment/df343a7a_140af90a
PS3, Line 57: struct GprsMs *ms
const
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30566
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8df01a99ccbfaf7a442ade5000ee282bd638fbba
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30566
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 21:06:24 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment