Attention is currently required from: pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change by fixeria. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/40717?usp=email )
Change subject: s1ap_proxy: fix per-eNB ?S1GW_CTR_S1AP_PROXY_IN_PKT_ALL ......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
File src/s1ap_proxy.erl:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/40717/comment/722246e2_030e1... : PS1, Line 649: _ ->
this "_" should actually be "undefined" afaiu?
Strictly speaking, yes. But the `_` also works in a situation when the eNB sends a different Global-eNB-ID in subsequent S1 Setup Request PDUs. I know it's unlikely to happen, but it does not bring additional complexity so why not.