Attention is currently required from: neels, laforge, fixeria.
pespin has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32043 )
Change subject: logging: add 'logging timezone (localtime|utc)'
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File src/core/logging.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32043/comment/54e4c407_f9b070fa
PS1, Line 874: target->timezone = timezone;
The bool vs enum aspect doesn't really affect the
aspect raised by pespin, does it? […]
I don't really understand why you are even
thinking about asserting or removing timestamps during logging when you can simply have a
VTY command fail to set a given timestamp format when you try to set it, as per what I
proposed.
I see nothing wrong with having a function returning a "rc" while others
don't, specially when there's an existing case which shows that the function may
fail (because system may not support it).
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32043
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I7f868b47bf8f8dfcf85e735f490ae69b18111af4
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32043
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2023 14:42:31 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment