Attention is currently required from: laforge, lynxis lazus, pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change by lynxis lazus. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38396?usp=email )
Change subject: SGSN: BSSGP_ConnHdlr: GMM Service Request: add support to expect
authentication
......................................................................
Patch Set 4: Code-Review-1
(3 comments)
Patchset:
PS4:
CR-1 due to potential API duplication.
File sgsn/BSSGP_ConnHdlr.ttcn:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38396/comment/08083a0d_c033…
:
PS4, Line 358: as_gmm_auth
You're adding this altstep, but not using it? Is it for a follow-up patch? I see
there's also `f_gmm_auth()` below, so what's the difference between the two?
I may be wrong, but I smell code duplication... If your new API is supposed to replace the
`f_gmm_auth()`, then the later should be removed.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38396/comment/da229720_6b83…
:
PS4, Line 363: Ignoring autn for now
TODO? `f_gmm_auth()` does handle AUTN, by the way.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38396?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I9ed08160bf5413e3a30d6e90eb947d4d799e1058
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38396
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:17:55 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes