Attention is currently required from: arehbein.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33465 )
Change subject: WIP: sgsn: Fix TC_attach_timeout_after_pdp_act failing
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File sgsn/SGSN_Tests.ttcn:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33465/comment/3f2f2c1b_2ef0…
PS2, Line 1078: vc_conn.done
> I gave this patch a try, and it fails due to `Tguard timeout` on my machine :/
AFAICS, osmo-sgsn is sending `GMM IDENTITY REQUEST: mi_type=IMEI`, but the testsuite does not respond.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33465
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ibaf2134247153471bd45d7a7f91155294c6c6de5
Gerrit-Change-Number: 33465
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 16:44:56 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: arehbein.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33465 )
Change subject: WIP: sgsn: Fix TC_attach_timeout_after_pdp_act failing
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File sgsn/SGSN_Tests.ttcn:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33465/comment/a2f682ed_55af…
PS2, Line 1078: vc_conn.done
> Oh, this indeed looks like a bug.
I gave this patch a try, and it fails due to `Tguard timeout` on my machine :/
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33465
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ibaf2134247153471bd45d7a7f91155294c6c6de5
Gerrit-Change-Number: 33465
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 16:42:16 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
pespin has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33466 )
Change subject: pcu: Wait for USF before start using UL TBF
......................................................................
pcu: Wait for USF before start using UL TBF
Change-Id: Ibe8f8c24b239715c0a43d52e59475011e78cb4eb
---
M pcu/GPRS_Components.ttcn
M pcu/PCU_Tests.ttcn
2 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-ttcn3-hacks refs/changes/66/33466/1
diff --git a/pcu/GPRS_Components.ttcn b/pcu/GPRS_Components.ttcn
index a3e8c94..b4c6a6c 100644
--- a/pcu/GPRS_Components.ttcn
+++ b/pcu/GPRS_Components.ttcn
@@ -992,6 +992,36 @@
return;
}
+/* Handle groups of PKT NEIGHBOUR CELL DATA packets */
+function f_ms_wait_usf(inout GprsMS ms, template (value) TsTrxBtsNum nr := ts_TsTrxBtsNum)
+runs on MS_BTS_IFACE_CT {
+ var BTS_PDTCH_Block data_msg;
+
+ BTS.send(ts_PCUIF_RTS_REQ(nr.bts_nr, nr.trx_nr, nr.ts_nr,
+ sapi := PCU_IF_SAPI_PDTCH, fn := 0,
+ arfcn := f_trxnr2arfcn(valueof(nr.trx_nr)),
+ block_nr := nr.blk_nr));
+ alt {
+ [] as_pcuif_rx_ignore_empty(nr);
+ [] BTS.receive(tr_PCUIF_DATA_PDTCH(nr.bts_nr,
+ tr_PCUIF_DATA(nr.trx_nr, nr.ts_nr, sapi := PCU_IF_SAPI_PDTCH),
+ ?)) -> value data_msg {
+ var uint3_t rx_usf := f_rlcmac_dl_block_get_usf(data_msg.dl_block);
+ var uint3_t exp_usf := ms.ul_tbf.usf[valueof(nr.ts_nr)];
+ log("Rx DL block USF ", rx_usf, " vs exp USF ", exp_usf);
+ if (rx_usf != exp_usf) {
+ BTS.send(ts_PCUIF_RTS_REQ(nr.bts_nr, nr.trx_nr, nr.ts_nr,
+ sapi := PCU_IF_SAPI_PDTCH, fn := 0,
+ arfcn := f_trxnr2arfcn(valueof(nr.trx_nr)),
+ block_nr := nr.blk_nr));
+ repeat;
+ }
+ }
+ };
+
+ return;
+}
+
////////////////////////
// Low level APIs
////////////////////////
diff --git a/pcu/PCU_Tests.ttcn b/pcu/PCU_Tests.ttcn
index e485868..24f0efe 100644
--- a/pcu/PCU_Tests.ttcn
+++ b/pcu/PCU_Tests.ttcn
@@ -326,6 +326,9 @@
var RlcmacDlBlock dl_block;
var uint32_t poll_fn;
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(g_ms[i]);
+
f_ms_tx_ul_data_block(g_ms[i], dummy, with_tlli := true, fn := g_ms[i].ul_tbf.start_time_fn, nr := nr);
f_rx_rlcmac_dl_block_exp_ack_nack(dl_block, poll_fn, nr := nr);
}
@@ -429,6 +432,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Send one UL block (with TLLI since we are in One-Phase Access
contention resolution) and make sure it is ACKED fine */
f_ms_tx_ul_data_block_multi(ms, 1, with_tlli := true, fn := ms.ul_tbf.start_time_fn);
@@ -531,6 +537,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* In a busy network, there can be a significant delay between resource
* allocation (Packet Uplink Assignment above) and the actual time when
* the MS is allowed to transmit the first Uplink data block. */
@@ -825,6 +834,8 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
/* The actual / old link quality values. We need to keep track of the old
* (basically previous) link quality value, because OsmoPCU actually
@@ -917,6 +928,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Send one UL block (with TLLI since we are in One-Phase Access
contention resolution) and make sure it is ACKED fine. */
/* 16 bytes fills the llc block (because TLLI takes 4 bytes) */
@@ -989,6 +1003,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Send one UL block (with TLLI since we are in One-Phase Access
contention resolution) and make sure it is ACKED fine. */
/* 16 bytes fills the llc block (because TLLI takes 4 bytes) */
@@ -1602,6 +1619,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
f_ms_tx_ul_data_block_multi(ms, 5, with_tlli := true);
exp_ul_ack_sub := tr_UlAckNackGprs(*, tr_AckNackDescription('1'B), *);
exp_ul_ack := tr_RLCMAC_UL_ACK_NACK_GPRS(ms.ul_tbf.tfi, exp_ul_ack_sub);
@@ -2172,6 +2192,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Send one UL block (with TLLI since we are in One-Phase Access
contention resolution) and make sure it is ACKED fine. */
total_payload := f_rnd_octstring(f_ultbf_payload_fill_length(ms.ul_tbf, true));
@@ -2223,6 +2246,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Send one UL block (with TLLI since we are in One-Phase Access
contention resolution) and make sure it is ACKED fine. */
payload := f_rnd_octstring(16); /* 16 bytes fills the llc block (because TLLI takes 4 bytes) */
@@ -2358,6 +2384,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
f_TC_ul_data_toolong_fills_padding_cs(ms, CS_2, 2);
f_TC_ul_data_toolong_fills_padding_cs(ms, CS_3, 1);
f_TC_ul_data_toolong_fills_padding_cs(ms, CS_4, 0);
@@ -2391,6 +2420,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Send one UL block (with TLLI since we are in One-Phase Access
contention resolution) and make sure it is ACKED fine */
f_ms_tx_ul_data_block_multi(ms, 1, with_tlli := true, fn := ms.ul_tbf.start_time_fn);
@@ -2668,6 +2700,9 @@
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
tfi := ms.ul_tbf.tfi;
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Send one UL block (with TLLI since we are in One-Phase Access
contention resolution) and make sure it is ACKED fine. */
payload := f_rnd_octstring(f_ultbf_payload_fill_length(ms.ul_tbf, true)); /* 16 bytes fills the llc block (because TLLI takes 4 bytes) */
@@ -2884,6 +2919,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Summary of what's transmitted:
* 1- UL RlcDataBlock(dataA) [BSN=0, CV=3]
* 2- UL RlcDataBlock(dataA finished, dataB starts) [BSN=1, CV=2]
@@ -3185,6 +3223,9 @@
through PDCH (no multiblock assignment possible through PCH) */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Send one UL block (with TLLI since we are in One-Phase Access
contention resolution) and make sure it is ACKED fine */
f_ms_tx_ul_data_block(ms, data, with_tlli := true, fn := ms.ul_tbf.start_time_fn,
@@ -3330,6 +3371,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Send one UL block (with TLLI since we are in One-Phase Access
contention resolution) and make sure it is ACKED fine */
f_ms_tx_ul_data_block_multi(ms, 1, with_tlli := true, fn := ms.ul_tbf.start_time_fn);
@@ -3416,6 +3460,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Send one UL block (with TLLI since we are in One-Phase Access
contention resolution) and make sure it is ACKED fine */
f_ms_tx_ul_data_block_multi(ms, 1, with_tlli := true, fn := ms.ul_tbf.start_time_fn);
@@ -3580,6 +3627,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* build mobile Identity */
mi := valueof(ts_MI_IMSI_LV(imsi));
mi_enc_lv := enc_MobileIdentityLV(mi);
@@ -3624,6 +3674,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Send paging request with or without TMSI */
if (use_ptmsi) {
tmsi := oct2int(f_rnd_octstring(4)); /* Random P-TMSI */
@@ -3786,6 +3839,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Fake GMM GPRS Attach or similar, PCU doesn't care about upper layers here */
f_ms_tx_ul_data_block_multi(ms, 1, with_tlli := true, fn := ms.ul_tbf.start_time_fn);
f_rx_rlcmac_dl_block_exp_ack_nack(dl_block, sched_fn);
@@ -3845,6 +3901,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Fake GMM GPRS Attach or similar, PCU doesn't care about upper layers here */
f_ms_tx_ul_data_block_multi(ms, 1, with_tlli := true, fn := ms.ul_tbf.start_time_fn);
f_rx_rlcmac_dl_block_exp_ack_nack(dl_block, sched_fn);
@@ -3960,6 +4019,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Send one UL block (with TLLI since we are in One-Phase Access
contention resolution) and make sure it is ACKED fine. */
payload := f_rnd_octstring(f_ultbf_payload_fill_length(ms.ul_tbf, true));
@@ -4024,6 +4086,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Send one UL block (with TLLI since we are in One-Phase Access
contention resolution) and make sure it is ACKED fine. */
payload := f_rnd_octstring(f_ultbf_payload_fill_length(ms.ul_tbf, true));
@@ -4048,6 +4113,9 @@
* The MS decides it want to send new Ul TBF so it send RACH req to ask for it: */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Send one UL block (with TLLI since we are in One-Phase Access
* contention resolution) and make sure it is ACKED fine. */
payload := f_rnd_octstring(f_ultbf_payload_fill_length(ms.ul_tbf, true));
@@ -4099,6 +4167,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Send one UL block (with TLLI since we are in One-Phase Access
contention resolution) and make sure it is ACKED fine. */
payload := f_rnd_octstring(f_ultbf_payload_fill_length(ms.ul_tbf, true));
@@ -4692,6 +4763,9 @@
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
+ /* Wait until PCU starts requesting for UL block on this TBF: */
+ f_ms_wait_usf(ms);
+
/* Send an Uplink block, so this TBF becomes "active" */
f_ms_tx_ul_data_block(ms, data, with_tlli := true, fn := ms.ul_tbf.start_time_fn);
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33466
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ibe8f8c24b239715c0a43d52e59475011e78cb4eb
Gerrit-Change-Number: 33466
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Attention is currently required from: osmith.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/33457 )
Change subject: osmo-bts-sysmo: mute PHY until OML is ready
......................................................................
Patch Set 8:
(1 comment)
File src/osmo-bts-sysmo/l1_if.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/33457/comment/e1a013dd_12f608a6
PS7, Line 1271: oml_mo_rf_lock_chg(&trx->mo, fl1h->last_rf_mute, 0);
> > did you check this is not sending StateChg before SW_ACT OML messages are sent? […]
I meant call to the oml_mo_rf_lock_chg() function, which also happens in the success case. IIUC without looking in detail that should trigger a StateChg message on OML.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/33457
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia1769f952fa787202a442a33db5ed4a1f7cbe9c3
Gerrit-Change-Number: 33457
Gerrit-PatchSet: 8
Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 16:21:22 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: arehbein.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33465 )
Change subject: WIP: sgsn: Fix TC_attach_timeout_after_pdp_act failing
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(2 comments)
File sgsn/SGSN_Tests.ttcn:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33465/comment/10964bef_8b9c…
PS2, Line 1067: setverdict(pass)
There is already `setverdict(pass)` below, this one is redundant.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33465/comment/997b7833_1934…
PS2, Line 1078: vc_conn.done
Oh, this indeed looks like a bug.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33465
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ibaf2134247153471bd45d7a7f91155294c6c6de5
Gerrit-Change-Number: 33465
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 16:01:29 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: arehbein, fixeria, pespin.
neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/python/osmo-python-tests/+/30980 )
Change subject: scripts/osmotestconfig.py: Fix tests failing due to attempted copy on socket files
......................................................................
Patch Set 5:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS5:
ah, arehbein, you added a "Code Review +1", I was talking about a "Verified +1". You can remove your CR+1 and add a V+1 instead
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/python/osmo-python-tests/+/30980
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: python/osmo-python-tests
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I3a3cc7ed135b60b97eb901cfc20fdcb924e4f664
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30980
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 15:59:51 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin.
osmith has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ci/+/33464 )
Change subject: lint: typedefs_osmo: add l1if_compl_cb
......................................................................
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+2
(2 comments)
Patchset:
PS1:
> a bit of explanation why is this needed would be welcome.
Done
Patchset:
PS2:
merging, this is trivial and comments are addressed
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ci/+/33464
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ci
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If045d1734e918af9ce1e5c37cbd305deab848b56
Gerrit-Change-Number: 33464
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 15:58:41 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
