Attention is currently required from: pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmocom-bb/+/32414 )
Change subject: layer23: modem: Set on tun the IP address received during PDP Ctx Act Accept
......................................................................
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+2
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmocom-bb/+/32414
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmocom-bb
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I39c27caeff0ccd08d8d8b5fcba5a1d69238d53ca
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32414
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:39:26 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin.
Hello Jenkins Builder,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/32498
to look at the new patch set (#2).
Change subject: ctrl: Add penalty time control
......................................................................
ctrl: Add penalty time control
Change-Id: Idfdd54dec72fb5f52eee22df018161d75b8c48c8
---
M src/osmo-bsc/bts_ctrl.c
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-bsc refs/changes/98/32498/2
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/32498
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Idfdd54dec72fb5f52eee22df018161d75b8c48c8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32498
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: matanp <matan1008(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Attention is currently required from: pespin.
matanp has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/32498 )
Change subject: ctrl: Add penalty time control
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(2 comments)
File src/osmo-bsc/bts_ctrl.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/32498/comment/6620a835_662185ce
PS1, Line 774: cmd->reply = talloc_asprintf(cmd, "%u", (bts->si_common.cell_ro_sel_par.penalty_time * 20) + 20);
> can you document with a comment in wich units is this?
Ack
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/32498/comment/40d4fb50_465c84fc
PS1, Line 796: CTRL_CMD_DEFINE(bts_penalty_time, "penalty-time");
> this looks really too generic ("bts.penalty-time"). […]
In comment or by renaming the penalty time to something like si3-penalty-time?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/32498
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Idfdd54dec72fb5f52eee22df018161d75b8c48c8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32498
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: matanp <matan1008(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:36:03 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: osmith, neels.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ci/+/32434 )
Change subject: publish-manuals-for-tags: enable IU/PFCP VTY cmds
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS3:
> if they were enabled by default, then we wouldn't have this problem of missing commands in the VTY r […]
I actually think they should be enabled by default in configure.ac, at least --enable-iu :)
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ci/+/32434
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ci
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I9685857348e3b38f13acc1429c7a49fb9e5d92f3
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32434
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:30:29 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: matanp.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/32498 )
Change subject: ctrl: Add penalty time control
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(2 comments)
File src/osmo-bsc/bts_ctrl.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/32498/comment/3e94323f_3ae71af7
PS1, Line 774: cmd->reply = talloc_asprintf(cmd, "%u", (bts->si_common.cell_ro_sel_par.penalty_time * 20) + 20);
can you document with a comment in wich units is this?
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/32498/comment/1c2f992c_4daa34ea
PS1, Line 796: CTRL_CMD_DEFINE(bts_penalty_time, "penalty-time");
this looks really too generic ("bts.penalty-time"). Maybe add some reference to SI and whatever cell_ro_sel_par is? Maybe add a referenece to spec section?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/32498
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Idfdd54dec72fb5f52eee22df018161d75b8c48c8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32498
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: matanp <matan1008(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: matanp <matan1008(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:28:51 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: osmith, pespin, fixeria.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/32399 )
Change subject: Move out of alloc_algo code modifying the data model
......................................................................
Patch Set 8:
(5 comments)
File src/alloc_algo.cpp:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/32399/comment/79bcab0e_99e8bfe3
PS8, Line 761: memset(res->usf, -1, sizeof(res->usf));
Are you sure this is correct? `sizeof(res->usf)` is not 8 in this case, but `sizeof(int) * 8`. This will likely work for `-1`, because it's basically `0xffffffff`, but doing e.g. `memset(res->usf, 1, sizeof(res->usf))` will result in 0x1010101 being written to each array item. Not critical, but I would rather avoid it for the good and init using a for-loop.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/32399/comment/52a151b4_fee57e13
PS8, Line 800: res->usf
`&res->usf[0]` would be cleaner here, otherwise it looks like you're passing a USF value, but then you go and check the `struct alloc_resources_res` and figure out that it's actually an array.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/32399/comment/db65f286_12d78ead
PS8, Line 863: struct alloc_resources_res *res)
coemstic: alignment
File src/tbf.cpp:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/32399/comment/ce86fd5d_0847d22d
PS7, Line 588:
> I'll add a comma. It's not really "and", it's more a cause->consequence or equal thing.
Done
File src/tbf_ul.cpp:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/32399/comment/47086095_3df413cf
PS8, Line 720: %u
`%d` because it's int?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/32399
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I5ffd00f5f80bde4b73b78db44896f65e70e12b20
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32399
Gerrit-PatchSet: 8
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <axilirator(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <axilirator(a)gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:20:39 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin.
neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sccp/+/32361 )
Change subject: SCCP: implement variable limit on Optional Data (CR,CC,CREF,RLSD)
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS3:
> Sorry I copy-pasted wrong, see the correct snippet: […]
IMO that is far too fine-grained, it's the very wrong place to put this low level SCCP config in every single osmo_sccp_address. Having this configured per SCCP instance is exactly the right spot.
Consider this: when I have one peer that needs a lower limit on the optional data, it is not harmful if we also use that lower limit with another peer that would be fine with the full 130. If the user wants separate limits on separate peers, she can still set up separate cs7 instances. But, I assume that this problem is not common -- we can rightfully expect peers to adhere to the SCCP spec, and as we introduce this workaround here, let's not go overboard with effort to make this super fine grained. (I am actually surprised to even see this problem in the field, with a commercial SGSN peer nonetheless... that product must have interop issues everywhere, and really they should fix the SGSN instead.)
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sccp/+/32361
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmo-sccp
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If35697234796af8943691b2de62218e7dc93a08c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32361
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 19:59:17 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: dexter.
neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/32290 )
Change subject: mgcp_network: do not deliver RTP packets with unpatched PT
......................................................................
Patch Set 3: Code-Review+1
(2 comments)
Commit Message:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/32290/comment/34973814_525a87f3
PS3, Line 9: call agent
by call agent, do you mean like BSC and MSC? So far I see call agent as meaning a PBX like freeswitch or kamailio. Maybe 'MGCP client'?
File src/libosmo-mgcp/mgcp_network.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/32290/comment/97bfe5d5_311c677a
PS3, Line 1168: DEBUG
I guess when we drop packets that would be LOGL_ERROR; only problem is with spamming 20 LOGL_ERROR per second... so maybe NOTICE? definitely DEBUG seems too insignificant when this is the single point of failure for establishing a voice call.
(I was thinking before about a mechanism in the MGW, where we sort of remember that previous RTP packets of an endp had identical errors, and we log an error only once, or maybe only once every ten seconds. Just thinking here, does not need to be part of this patch.)
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/32290
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-mgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I013a24c1e0f853557257368cfab9192d4611aafa
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32290
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 19:44:37 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment