Attention is currently required from: laforge.
falconia has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32184 )
Change subject: codec: add SID preening functions for FR & EFR
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
File src/codec/gsm610.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32184/comment/13e357ee_f0c4a998
PS3, Line 428: /* should never be reached */
: return false;
> I would actually put a default clause and OSMO_ASSERT() in it. […]
I agree with OSMO_ASSERT() approach, and I shall implement it in the next iteration.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32184
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iec5c1f2619a82499f61cb3e5a7cd03ff0f020ad8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32184
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 12:15:39 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
falconia has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32183 )
Change subject: codec: add SID classification functions per GSM 06.31 & 06.81
......................................................................
codec: add SID classification functions per GSM 06.31 & 06.81
The existing osmo_{fr,efr}_check_sid() functions detect whether or not
the frame of bits passed to them constitutes an absolutely perfect
SID frame, with each of 95 SID code word bits set to 0 for FR or
1 for EFR. However, the rules of section 6.1.1 in GSM 06.31 & 06.81
allow up to one bit to be in error for the frame to be accepted as
valid SID, and the same rules also call out a third state (invalid SID)
in between valid SID frames and other frames that are classified as
speech. Support for these rules cannot be patched into those familiar
osmo_{fr,efr}_check_sid() functions because doing so would alter
behavior of existing programs, hence new functions need to be added.
The new functions that implement the exact rules of section 6.1.1 of
GSM 06.31 and 06.81 will need to be used if anyone needs to construct
an outgoing TRAU-UL frame (for example, as part of implementing
TS 28.062 TFO), and they are expected to be useful as part of more
sophisticated ECU implementations.
Change-Id: Ie91a52c6f04689082d8004311517d8ce0c544916
---
M include/osmocom/codec/codec.h
M src/codec/gsm610.c
M src/codec/gsm660.c
3 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
Approvals:
Jenkins Builder: Verified
laforge: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve
fixeria: Looks good to me, approved
diff --git a/include/osmocom/codec/codec.h b/include/osmocom/codec/codec.h
index 65de20d..2bdae60 100644
--- a/include/osmocom/codec/codec.h
+++ b/include/osmocom/codec/codec.h
@@ -81,9 +81,20 @@
}
}
+/* SID ternary classification per GSM 06.31 & 06.81 section 6.1.1 */
+enum osmo_gsm631_sid_class {
+ OSMO_GSM631_SID_CLASS_SPEECH = 0,
+ OSMO_GSM631_SID_CLASS_INVALID = 1,
+ OSMO_GSM631_SID_CLASS_VALID = 2,
+};
+
bool osmo_fr_check_sid(const uint8_t *rtp_payload, size_t payload_len);
bool osmo_hr_check_sid(const uint8_t *rtp_payload, size_t payload_len);
bool osmo_efr_check_sid(const uint8_t *rtp_payload, size_t payload_len);
+
+enum osmo_gsm631_sid_class osmo_fr_sid_classify(const uint8_t *rtp_payload);
+enum osmo_gsm631_sid_class osmo_efr_sid_classify(const uint8_t *rtp_payload);
+
int osmo_amr_rtp_enc(uint8_t *payload, uint8_t cmr, enum osmo_amr_type ft,
enum osmo_amr_quality bfi);
int osmo_amr_rtp_dec(const uint8_t *payload, int payload_len, uint8_t *cmr,
diff --git a/src/codec/gsm610.c b/src/codec/gsm610.c
index ff9952a..d29d9cb 100644
--- a/src/codec/gsm610.c
+++ b/src/codec/gsm610.c
@@ -296,6 +296,21 @@
29, /* LARc5:0 */
};
+static const uint16_t sid_code_word_bits[95] = {
+ /* bit numbers are relative to the RTP frame beginning,
+ * with signature bits included in the count. */
+ 57, 58, 60, 61, 63, 64, 66, 67, 69, 70, 72, 73,
+ 75, 76, 78, 79, 81, 82, 84, 85, 87, 88, 90, 91,
+ 93, 94, 113, 114, 116, 117, 119, 120, 122, 123,
+ 125, 126, 128, 129, 131, 132, 134, 135, 137,
+ 138, 140, 141, 143, 144, 146, 147, 149, 150,
+ 169, 170, 172, 173, 175, 176, 178, 179, 181,
+ 182, 184, 185, 187, 188, 190, 191, 193, 194,
+ 196, 197, 199, 200, 202, 203, 205, 206, 225,
+ 226, 228, 229, 231, 232, 234, 235, 237, 240,
+ 243, 246, 249, 252, 255, 258, 261
+};
+
/*! Check whether RTP frame contains FR SID code word according to
* TS 101 318 §5.1.2
* \param[in] rtp_payload Buffer with RTP payload
@@ -305,16 +320,7 @@
bool osmo_fr_check_sid(const uint8_t *rtp_payload, size_t payload_len)
{
struct bitvec bv;
- uint16_t i, z_bits[] = { 57, 58, 60, 61, 63, 64, 66, 67, 69, 70, 72, 73,
- 75, 76, 78, 79, 81, 82, 84, 85, 87, 88, 90, 91,
- 93, 94, 113, 114, 116, 117, 119, 120, 122, 123,
- 125, 126, 128, 129, 131, 132, 134, 135, 137,
- 138, 140, 141, 143, 144, 146, 147, 149, 150,
- 169, 170, 172, 173, 175, 176, 178, 179, 181,
- 182, 184, 185, 187, 188, 190, 191, 193, 194,
- 196, 197, 199, 200, 202, 203, 205, 206, 225,
- 226, 228, 229, 231, 232, 234, 235, 237, 240,
- 243, 246, 249, 252, 255, 258, 261 };
+ uint16_t i;
/* signature does not match Full Rate SID */
if ((rtp_payload[0] >> 4) != 0xD)
@@ -323,10 +329,63 @@
bv.data = (uint8_t *) rtp_payload;
bv.data_len = payload_len;
- /* code word is all 0 at given bits, numbered from 1 */
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(z_bits); i++)
- if (bitvec_get_bit_pos(&bv, z_bits[i]) != ZERO)
+ /* code word is all 0 at given bits */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sid_code_word_bits); i++) {
+ if (bitvec_get_bit_pos(&bv, sid_code_word_bits[i]) != ZERO)
return false;
+ }
return true;
}
+
+/*! Classify potentially-SID FR codec frame in RTP format according
+ * to the rules of GSM 06.31 §6.1.1
+ * \param[in] rtp_payload Buffer with RTP payload
+ * \returns enum osmo_gsm631_sid_class, with symbolic values
+ * OSMO_GSM631_SID_CLASS_SPEECH, OSMO_GSM631_SID_CLASS_INVALID or
+ * OSMO_GSM631_SID_CLASS_VALID corresponding to the 3 possible bit-counting
+ * classifications prescribed by the spec.
+ *
+ * Differences between the more familiar osmo_fr_check_sid() and the present
+ * function are:
+ *
+ * 1. osmo_fr_check_sid() returns true only if the SID frame is absolutely
+ * perfect, with all 95 bits of the SID code word zeroed. However, the
+ * rules of GSM 06.31 §6.1.1 allow up to one bit to be in error,
+ * and the frame is still accepted as valid SID.
+ *
+ * 2. The third possible state of invalid SID is not handled at all by the
+ * simpler osmo_fr_check_sid() function.
+ *
+ * 3. osmo_fr_check_sid() includes a check for 0xD RTP signature, and returns
+ * false if that signature nibble is wrong. That check is not included
+ * in the present version because there is no place for it in the
+ * ETSI-prescribed classification, it is neither speech nor SID. The
+ * assumption is that this function is used to classify the bit content
+ * of received codec frames, not their RTP encoding - the latter needs
+ * to be validated beforehand.
+ *
+ * Which function should one use? The answer depends on the specific
+ * circumstances, and needs to be addressed on a case-by-case basis.
+ */
+enum osmo_gsm631_sid_class osmo_fr_sid_classify(const uint8_t *rtp_payload)
+{
+ struct bitvec bv;
+ uint16_t i, n;
+
+ bv.data = (uint8_t *) rtp_payload;
+ bv.data_len = GSM_FR_BYTES;
+
+ /* count not-SID-matching bits per the spec */
+ n = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sid_code_word_bits); i++) {
+ if (bitvec_get_bit_pos(&bv, sid_code_word_bits[i]) != ZERO)
+ n++;
+ if (n >= 16)
+ return OSMO_GSM631_SID_CLASS_SPEECH;
+ }
+ if (n >= 2)
+ return OSMO_GSM631_SID_CLASS_INVALID;
+ else
+ return OSMO_GSM631_SID_CLASS_VALID;
+}
diff --git a/src/codec/gsm660.c b/src/codec/gsm660.c
index 46ecdac..c6e694c 100644
--- a/src/codec/gsm660.c
+++ b/src/codec/gsm660.c
@@ -258,6 +258,21 @@
246, /* 259 -> PULSE 4_10: b0 */
};
+static const uint8_t sid_code_word_bits[95] = {
+ /* bit numbers are relative to "pure" EFR frame beginning,
+ * not counting the signature bits. */
+ 45, 46, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55,
+ 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65,
+ 66, 67, 68, 94, 95, 96, 98, 99, 100, 101,
+ 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111,
+ 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 148, 149, 150,
+ 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160,
+ 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170,
+ 171, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204,
+ 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216,
+ 217, 218, 219, 220, 221
+};
+
/*! Check whether RTP frame contains EFR SID code word according to
* TS 101 318 §5.3.2
* \param[in] rtp_payload Buffer with RTP payload
@@ -268,19 +283,6 @@
{
struct bitvec bv;
uint16_t i;
- static const uint8_t sid_code_word_bits[95] = {
- /* bit numbers relative to "pure" EFR frame beginning,
- * not counting the signature bits. */
- 45, 46, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55,
- 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65,
- 66, 67, 68, 94, 95, 96, 98, 99, 100, 101,
- 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111,
- 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 148, 149, 150,
- 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160,
- 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170,
- 171, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204,
- 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216,
- 217, 218, 219, 220, 221 };
/* signature does not match Enhanced Full Rate SID */
if ((rtp_payload[0] >> 4) != 0xC)
@@ -297,3 +299,55 @@
return true;
}
+
+/*! Classify potentially-SID EFR codec frame in RTP format according
+ * to the rules of GSM 06.81 §6.1.1
+ * \param[in] rtp_payload Buffer with RTP payload
+ * \returns enum osmo_gsm631_sid_class, with symbolic values
+ * OSMO_GSM631_SID_CLASS_SPEECH, OSMO_GSM631_SID_CLASS_INVALID or
+ * OSMO_GSM631_SID_CLASS_VALID corresponding to the 3 possible bit-counting
+ * classifications prescribed by the spec.
+ *
+ * Differences between the more familiar osmo_efr_check_sid() and the present
+ * function are:
+ *
+ * 1. osmo_efr_check_sid() returns true only if the SID frame is absolutely
+ * perfect, with all 95 bits of the SID code word set. However, the
+ * rules of GSM 06.81 §6.1.1 allow up to one bit to be in error,
+ * and the frame is still accepted as valid SID.
+ *
+ * 2. The third possible state of invalid SID is not handled at all by the
+ * simpler osmo_efr_check_sid() function.
+ *
+ * 3. osmo_efr_check_sid() includes a check for 0xC RTP signature, and returns
+ * false if that signature nibble is wrong. That check is not included
+ * in the present version because there is no place for it in the
+ * ETSI-prescribed classification, it is neither speech nor SID. The
+ * assumption is that this function is used to classify the bit content
+ * of received codec frames, not their RTP encoding - the latter needs
+ * to be validated beforehand.
+ *
+ * Which function should one use? The answer depends on the specific
+ * circumstances, and needs to be addressed on a case-by-case basis.
+ */
+enum osmo_gsm631_sid_class osmo_efr_sid_classify(const uint8_t *rtp_payload)
+{
+ struct bitvec bv;
+ uint16_t i, n;
+
+ bv.data = (uint8_t *) rtp_payload;
+ bv.data_len = GSM_EFR_BYTES;
+
+ /* count not-SID-matching bits per the spec */
+ n = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sid_code_word_bits); i++) {
+ if (bitvec_get_bit_pos(&bv, sid_code_word_bits[i]+4) != ONE)
+ n++;
+ if (n >= 16)
+ return OSMO_GSM631_SID_CLASS_SPEECH;
+ }
+ if (n >= 2)
+ return OSMO_GSM631_SID_CLASS_INVALID;
+ else
+ return OSMO_GSM631_SID_CLASS_VALID;
+}
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32183
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie91a52c6f04689082d8004311517d8ce0c544916
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32183
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
Attention is currently required from: neels.
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/docker-playground/+/32330 )
Change subject: stp: Expand osmo-stp.cfg for "norctx" tests
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
File ttcn3-stp-test/osmo-stp.cfg:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/docker-playground/+/32330/comment/291bf013_518…
PS1, Line 75: asp asp-client60-norctx m3ua
> ... […]
I don't have a way to realistically test the dockerized setup while travelling. I've only run the full STP test suite directly without docker. If anyone else (e.g. you) not on holidays can fix/test/resubmit the docker-playground bit here,it would be nice. Unfortunately our current gerrit version doesn't seem to allow me to assign a patch to anyone else anymore, like it was possible in the past for an author to delegate responsibility.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/docker-playground/+/32330
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: docker-playground
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie00d96d04dd36c71c79f3b73713c3fe1c26a5145
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32330
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 09:10:38 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: falconia, pespin, fixeria.
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32183 )
Change subject: codec: add SID classification functions per GSM 06.31 & 06.81
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
File include/osmocom/codec/codec.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32183/comment/7f967f8a_c450e7e2
PS1, Line 85: etsi_sid_class
> given that other functions just above/below use osmo_{fr,efr,amr}, I would suggest to use that rathe […]
nevermind, it's just the enum name that has osmo_gsm631 where that actually makes sense.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32183
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie91a52c6f04689082d8004311517d8ce0c544916
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32183
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 09:07:02 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: falconia.
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32184 )
Change subject: codec: add SID preening functions for FR & EFR
......................................................................
Patch Set 3: Code-Review+1
(2 comments)
File src/codec/gsm610.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32184/comment/6bf8bc31_5aa3980e
PS3, Line 428: /* should never be reached */
: return false;
I would actually put a default clause and OSMO_ASSERT() in it. Just to make sure we don't ever end up silently ignoring strange values that might be hypothetically returned from osmo_fr_sid_classify() in the future. Or alternatively, if you consider it too drastic, put a log message about it.
File src/codec/gsm660.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32184/comment/51b8ed09_1335678b
PS3, Line 391:
likewise here.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32184
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iec5c1f2619a82499f61cb3e5a7cd03ff0f020ad8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32184
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 09:05:36 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: falconia, pespin, fixeria.
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32183 )
Change subject: codec: add SID classification functions per GSM 06.31 & 06.81
......................................................................
Patch Set 3: Code-Review+1
(1 comment)
File include/osmocom/codec/codec.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32183/comment/69fc7fed_79f88a13
PS1, Line 85: etsi_sid_class
> In the new patchset the enum is named osmo_gsm631_sid_class and its items are prefixed with OSMO_GSM […]
given that other functions just above/below use osmo_{fr,efr,amr}, I would suggest to use that rather than osmo_gsm631 (which not even I would know off my head which of the codecs it is). But I'm happy to submit a follow-up patch to do the rename if you think you're running out of patience now.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32183
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie91a52c6f04689082d8004311517d8ce0c544916
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32183
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 09:00:45 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Comment-In-Reply-To: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin, fixeria.
falconia has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32183 )
Change subject: codec: add SID classification functions per GSM 06.31 & 06.81
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
File include/osmocom/codec/codec.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32183/comment/cbb92864_83545425
PS1, Line 85: etsi_sid_class
> pespin is correct in that they predate our naming conventions. […]
In the new patchset the enum is named osmo_gsm631_sid_class and its items are prefixed with OSMO_GSM631_.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32183
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie91a52c6f04689082d8004311517d8ce0c544916
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32183
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 02:11:00 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
falconia has abandoned this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32197 )
Change subject: include/osmocom/gsm/protocol: add gsm_06_31.h
......................................................................
Abandoned
Based on comments from reviewers, I get the sense that the community consensus is to prefix the GSM 06.31 SID enum and its items with osmo_ even though it is not Osmo-defined, for the sake of namespace containment. In this case there is no need for a separate <osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_06_31.h> header.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32197
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If004b668778d3d9cf6cd998b3af2dbfa83691529
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32197
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: abandon
Hello Jenkins Builder,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32184
to look at the new patch set (#3).
Change subject: codec: add SID preening functions for FR & EFR
......................................................................
codec: add SID preening functions for FR & EFR
Those network elements which receive a stream of codec frames that
may come from the uplink of GSM call A and which are responsible
for preparing the frame stream for the downlink of GSM call B
(OsmoMGW feeding TRAU-DL, or OsmoBTS receiving RTP and feeding DL
to its PHY) must be prepared for the possibility that their
incoming frame stream may contain corrupted SID frames, presumably
from bit errors on radio link A. Per the rules of section 6.1.1
of GSM 06.31 for FR and GSM 06.81 for EFR, SID frames with just one
errored bit are still to be accepted as valid, whereas frames with
more corrupted bits which are still recognizable as SID are classified
as invalid SID.
In the case of a TrFO call, the entity switching from leg A UL to
leg B DL is responsible for *not* transmitting invalid SID frames
on the destination leg (they should be treated like BFIs), and any
deemed-valid SID frames that are forwarded should be preened,
correcting that one bit error they may exhibit. The functions
added here provide that functionality.
Change-Id: Iec5c1f2619a82499f61cb3e5a7cd03ff0f020ad8
---
M include/osmocom/codec/codec.h
M src/codec/gsm610.c
M src/codec/gsm660.c
3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/libosmocore refs/changes/84/32184/3
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/32184
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iec5c1f2619a82499f61cb3e5a7cd03ff0f020ad8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32184
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset