Attention is currently required from: daniel, laforge, pespin.
arehbein has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34720?usp=email )
Change subject: gsmtap: Hide implementation of gsmtap_inst
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File include/osmocom/core/gsmtap_util.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34720/comment/32b7b9d8_6b53441d
PS2, Line 30:
Instead of adding `gsmtap_inst_fd2()`, I could also
just keep using `wq.bfd. […]
I think this would allow us to keep `gsmtap_inst_fd()`
as `static inline` inside the header, without needing to change that part of the API?
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34720?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ibe1a51205a6df764571b6d074e365825555609a5
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34720
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:29:24 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment