pespin has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/27646 )
Change subject: jenkins: Validate gsm 08.58 IEs are added to tlv_definition ......................................................................
jenkins: Validate gsm 08.58 IEs are added to tlv_definition
It was recently found that several IEs which were added in the header file were not actually added to the tlv_definition, and hence the tlv parser failed to decode them. Let's make sure we don't foget to add new IEs in the future.
Related: SYS#5915
Change-Id: Id8a679ca43eb0fcc4882780e9a95ec21c7f51972 --- M contrib/jenkins_common.sh M include/osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_08_58.h 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/libosmocore refs/changes/46/27646/1
diff --git a/contrib/jenkins_common.sh b/contrib/jenkins_common.sh index c39b356..fc85a90 100644 --- a/contrib/jenkins_common.sh +++ b/contrib/jenkins_common.sh @@ -28,6 +28,20 @@ } verify_gsm0808_tlv_definition
+verify_gsm_08_05_tlv_definition() { + set +x; + enums=$(grep "RSL_IE_" include/osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_08_58.h | grep "=" | awk '{ print $1 }') + counted_enums=$(for f in $enums; do printf "%-60s %s\n" "$f" "$(grep -c "[$f]" src/gsm/rsl.c)"; done) + missing_enums=$(echo "$counted_enums" | grep "0$" || true) + if [ "x$missing_enums" != "x" ]; then + echo "Missing IEs in src/gsm/rsl.c!" + echo "$missing_enums" + exit 1 + fi + set -x; +} +verify_gsm_08_05_tlv_definition + prep_build() { _src_dir="$1" _build_dir="$2" diff --git a/include/osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_08_58.h b/include/osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_08_58.h index 7a527ff..d1720fa 100644 --- a/include/osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_08_58.h +++ b/include/osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_08_58.h @@ -385,9 +385,9 @@ RSL_IE_IPAC_RTP_CSD_FMT = 0xf9, RSL_IE_IPAC_RTP_JIT_BUF = 0xfa, RSL_IE_IPAC_RTP_COMPR = 0xfb, - RSL_IE_IPAC_RTP_PAYLOAD2= 0xfc, + RSL_IE_IPAC_RTP_PAYLOAD2 = 0xfc, RSL_IE_IPAC_RTP_MPLEX = 0xfd, - RSL_IE_IPAC_RTP_MPLEX_ID= 0xfe, + RSL_IE_IPAC_RTP_MPLEX_ID = 0xfe, };
/* Ericsson specific IEs, clash with above partially, so they're not