Attention is currently required from: laforge, fixeria, pespin. neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33169 ) Change subject: fix umts_cell_id_name(): show CID ...................................................................... Patch Set 4: (1 comment) Commit Message: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33169/comment/faaf6407_eeeac9b9 PS3, Line 12: Use OTC_SELECT Let me add that I don't know how it happened, but i overlooked some responses when writing the above. I appreciate the benchmark: It would also be interesting to compare whether there is a difference between the two variants when the logging is turned off: is there an impact by unused static buffers? But clearly, it does, and clearly there are reasons for it, and requirements that OTC_SELECT meets better than static buffers do. Using OTC_SELECT helps to completely rule out several entire families of problems in code maintenance, <cue the previous long comment> -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33169 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Id903b8579ded8b908e644808e440d373bcca8da4 Gerrit-Change-Number: 33169 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: neels &lt;nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de&gt; Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria &lt;vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de&gt; Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge &lt;laforge(a)osmocom.org&gt; Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin &lt;pespin(a)sysmocom.de&gt; Gerrit-Attention: laforge &lt;laforge(a)osmocom.org&gt; Gerrit-Attention: fixeria &lt;vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de&gt; Gerrit-Attention: pespin &lt;pespin(a)sysmocom.de&gt; Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 02:51:29 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: neels &lt;nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de&gt; Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge &lt;laforge(a)osmocom.org&gt; Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin &lt;pespin(a)sysmocom.de&gt; Gerrit-MessageType: comment