Attention is currently required from: neels, pespin.
laforge has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-pfcp/+/36347?usp=email )
Change subject: pfcp up_function_features: allow shorter lengths
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
(2 comments)
File src/libosmo-pfcp/pfcp_ies_custom.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-pfcp/+/36347/comment/07fe9b28_7f2fce94
PS1, Line 435: * if the peer sends less octets, make do with what we get. */
"make do" ?
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/make-do
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-pfcp/+/36347/comment/8f2d8350_a4151eef
PS1, Line 436: memset(up_function_features->bits, 0,
sizeof(up_function_features->bits));
we can probably avoid memcpying twice.
where's the second memcpy? you mean avoiding memset and memcpy'ing the same
location? I'm always hoping compilers are smart enough to figure that out during
optimization. But I never really tested that "hope".
Also, this isn't really a super performance critical code path, so let's not
over-optimize.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-pfcp/+/36347?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmo-pfcp
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I40e255fd0b4770e578aea7a10ba88f5eeba087f4
Gerrit-Change-Number: 36347
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:43:33 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment