Attention is currently required from: fixeria, dexter.
pespin has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31341
)
Change subject: pcu_l1_if_phy: flexible phy access
......................................................................
Patch Set 7: Code-Review+1
(2 comments)
File src/osmobts_sock.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31341/comment/ccf26d2a_1ef0c163
PS5, Line 115: bts->trx[trx].fl1h = NULL;
l1if_close_pdch exists when the_pcu->phy_ops (see
above). I think it should be ok.
If you want to make it mandatory for any driver to
implement that function then yes it's fine
File src/pcu_l1_if.cpp:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31341/comment/1b16ee3b_17844078
PS5, Line 218: the_pcu->phy_ops->l1if_pdch_req(bts->trx[trx].fl1h, ts, 0, fn,
arfcn, block_nr,
It checks for the_pcu->phy_ops. […]
Again,
this makes this function mandatory to be implemented by the driver.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31341
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8692d1bd5d137a17cf596ee2914722f419c9978d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 31341
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:35:36 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment