Attention is currently required from: fixeria, pespin, dexter.
laforge has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33634 )
Change subject: S1AP_Templates: fix tr_S1AP_SetupResp
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
File library/s1ap/S1AP_Templates.ttcn:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33634/comment/460a327b_602a…
PS1, Line 116: *, {
Like in the preceding patch, there is only one
*optional* `MME Name` IE. Using `?` would mean we expect it to be always present.
yes, correct.
I like the idea of `superset`, but I am afraid those
PDUs are automatically generated from ASN.1 by TITAN?
The only question is to which TTCN-3 type the protocilIEs field is converted. If its
"set of", then superset woudl work. If it's "record of", then
not. One has to eitehr look at the generated C++ code, or review the ETSI Spec that
contains the ASN.1 -> TTCN3 mapping that is used in a TTCN3 compiler like TITAN.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33634
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I07513743142f519481530801d4e1185d55f6ea4b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 33634
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 18:36:59 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment