Attention is currently required from: fixeria, pespin, dexter. laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33634 ) Change subject: S1AP_Templates: fix tr_S1AP_SetupResp ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) File library/s1ap/S1AP_Templates.ttcn: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33634/comment/460a327b_602a5... PS1, Line 116: *, {
Like in the preceding patch, there is only one *optional* `MME Name` IE. Using `?` would mean we expect it to be always present.
yes, correct.
I like the idea of `superset`, but I am afraid those PDUs are automatically generated from ASN.1 by TITAN?
The only question is to which TTCN-3 type the protocilIEs field is converted. If its "set of", then superset woudl work. If it's "record of", then not. One has to eitehr look at the generated C++ code, or review the ETSI Spec that contains the ASN.1 -> TTCN3 mapping that is used in a TTCN3 compiler like TITAN. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/33634 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I07513743142f519481530801d4e1185d55f6ea4b Gerrit-Change-Number: 33634 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge@osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 18:36:59 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge@osmocom.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy@sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment