Attention is currently required from: neels, pespin, fixeria. laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/31085 ) Change subject: hnbgw: add HNBAP port to ConnHdlr ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) File hnbgw/HNBGW_Tests.ttcn: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/31085/comment/7590b215_194e… PS1, Line 414: /* disconnect test_CT HNBAP[i], instead connect ConnHdlr.HNBAP to HNBAP[i] */ conceptually it just feels wrong. A ConnHdlr relates to a Subscriber. HNBAP UE register relates to a subscriber. But HNB register relates to a HNB. Architecturally, IMHO, this means the clean approach is to have some kind of "HNBAP_Emulation" component which separates the per-hnb and the per-UE messages. The per-ue related messages then get dispatched to the respective ConnHdlr component. For the per-hnb signals, they might need to be broadcast to all ConnHdlr serving UEs of that HNB. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/31085 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I1e7ffded5bd9974c444dbb567b6afa643b5b2501 Gerrit-Change-Number: 31085 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 10:51:58 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment