Attention is currently required from: osmith, pespin. dexter has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/34575?usp=email ) Change subject: gprs_rlcmac_sched: check if we really use direct phy ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: (1 comment) File src/gprs_rlcmac_sched.cpp: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/34575/comment/041dbd01_b3941f83 PS2, Line 491: if (bts->trx[trx].fl1h) { First of all: Yes, I also think the behavior is changed. When we compile osmo-pcu with direct-phy support and osmo-bts-sysmo uses direct phy support we should be fine. When we do not use direct phy support (does not matter whether it is compiled in or not), then skip_idle = skip_idle && trx != 0; is not executed. As far as I understand the PCU will then not generate the idle frames. Osmo-bts would do this then. Or do you think that osmo-bts-sysmo needs the idle frames but osmo-bts-trx not? I am a bit lost here. I always thought the behaviour would be the same for all BTS models in that regard. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/34575?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I0808950b1154bbb9a789c3f706ad9fb6618764ec Gerrit-Change-Number: 34575 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 13:49:21 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment