Attention is currently required from: fixeria, laforge, pespin.
neels has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/36538?usp=email )
Change subject: add osmo_stats_report_lock api
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS2:
And for the case at hand, I still belive it makes much
more sense to simply use an osmo_itq to pass […]
I'm in a bit of a
communication dilemma:
- laforge says don't use any mutexes and just directly write to rate_ctr from the
other thread.
- pespin says use an osmo_it_q here
- pespin says use intermediate storage with mutexes in a comment at
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/36385
- nhofmeyr says directly write to rate_ctr, but still have a mutex around stats reporting,
so that counter pairs are always in sync.
I interpret it so that laforge is radically "bare-metal" and simple, pespin
radically thread-safe and elaborate, and i'm actually in the middle, a little more to
laforge's side.
Yet it seems you guys are missing the actual point for this patch here:
A mutex lock around stats reporting is a very basic and very powerful tool.
It allows a multi-threaded application to decide which stats updates will always be in
sync.
This patch adds this feature, in a completely optional way.
It is up to the application how to make use of it,
so let's discuss those details at the other patches.
I fail to see any problem with this patch and don't know how we can reach a consensus
on this. Neither of us seems to accept the others' arguments. At least I still think
that I'm right...
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/36538?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib335bea7d2a440ca284e6c439066f96456bf2c2d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 36538
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:17:47 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment