Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin, keith, dexter.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/32423 )
Change subject: er_ccu_l1_if: use one ccu_desr per timeslot
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File src/ericsson-rbs/er_ccu_descr.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/32423/comment/f63b3502_4ae42410
PS1, Line 52: 8
I am also not so happy with this. I was searching for
a define constant, but I couldn't fine one. […]
I wouldn't bother adding
this to libosmocore. It's a well-known constant for everyone working with GSM, which
is not that hard to remember (compared to number of frames in a multiframe, for instance).
I am fine with writing `foo[8]` in `*.h` files and then using `ARRAY_SIZE(foo)` in `*.c`
files.
Maybe clarify the field name a but? How about `ts_ccu_descr` or `per_ts_ccu_descr`?
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/32423
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I09a51f34ce0edef79a797c4686c7b1d27c376e49
Gerrit-Change-Number: 32423
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: keith <keith(a)rhizomatica.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: keith <keith(a)rhizomatica.org>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 01 May 2023 17:48:17 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment