Attention is currently required from: pespin.

fixeria has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/40271?usp=email )

Change subject: hnbgw: Introduce altstep as_pfcp_handle_del_req() ......................................................................

Patch Set 1:

(2 comments)

File hnbgw/ConnHdlr.ttcn:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/40271/comment/7fc00236_ecc02... : PS1, Line 998: PFCP.receive(PDU_PFCP:?) This catch-all `.receive` makes the altstep less useful, because this way it cannot be used among with other `PFCP.receive` statements / altsteps. If you want it to be self-contained, then maybe turn it into a generic `f_pfcp_receive()` function with the timeout.

File hnbgw/HNBGW_Tests.ttcn:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/40271/comment/787fe69b_30a26... : PS1, Line 1545: as_pfcp_handle_del_req Potential side-effect: the new altstep is doing `f_PFCPEM_unsubscribe_seid()`, which was not here before.