Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change by fixeria. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/40281?usp=email )
Change subject: enft_kpi: retrieve per-eNB traffic counters
......................................................................
Patch Set 8:
(6 comments)
File config/sys.config:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/40281/comment/63319ec0_4b19…
:
PS8, Line 24: %% {enft_kpi_enable, true}, %% whether to enable the NFT KPI module
(default: false)
where does the "e" from "enft"
come from? At first sight looks like "nft" would be much more compreh […]
It's because I named the library `enftables` (Erlang NIFs for libnftables), and
this `e` prefix made it here too (the code is using `enftables`, so the module name is
`enft_kpi` and thus param names).
File include/s1gw_metrics.hrl:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/40281/comment/94c79ab8_139f…
:
PS8, Line 40: %% NOTE: these counters shall not be listed in ?S1GW_COUNTERS,
So simply this can be announced as "Per-eNB
counters"?
Right. Other counters will be made per-eNB too at some point.
I am adding a NOTE here because a NOTE below states that new entries need to be added to
`s1gw_metric:init()` (actually `?S1GW_COUNTERS` or `?S1GW_GAUGES`). I don't think it
hurts?
File rebar.config:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/40281/comment/5e948f09_fd04…
:
PS8, Line 13: {git,
"https://gitea.osmocom.org/vyanitskiy/enftables.git", {branch,
"fixeria/json"}}},
can we have this in a "osmocom/master" or
"master" branch instead?
The whole repository currently lives in my
personal Gitea profile and will be migrated to
https://gitea.osmocom.org/erlang/. I'll
also merge this branch into `master`. I'll do this once the customer completes initial
testing.
File src/enft_kpi.erl:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/40281/comment/c9c94a34_c914…
:
PS8, Line 142: R1 = [nft_expr_match_ip_proto("udp", ?OP_NEQ),
nft_expr_accept()],
sounds like you may want to introduce atoms in the nft
lib to express OP_NEQ and OP_EQ instead.
Actually, a lot of this stuff can be moved
to `enftables`. But for now it can live here.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/40281/comment/25dbb0bc_d691…
:
PS8, Line 341: case enb_add_nft_counters(ES0#{addr => Addr}, Cfg) of
fyi this can take some time, and afaict you are doing
it synchronously (handle_call), which means th […]
Good point. I'll migrate this
to use `cast` instead of `call`.
File src/osmo_s1gw_sup.erl:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/40281/comment/67f245fc_decb…
:
PS8, Line 81: EnftKpi = {enft_kpi, {enft_kpi, start_link, [enft_kpi_cfg()]},
I?m still wondering why this is called
"enft" but above it's called "Pfcp" and not "Epfcp" or
"Sctp" […]
See the other comment.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/40281?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: erlang/osmo-s1gw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I498d2854447a2d53d2abddd38652f3e2bbb1fbdd
Gerrit-Change-Number: 40281
Gerrit-PatchSet: 8
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 12:07:49 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>