Attention is currently required from: daniel, laforge, pespin.
arehbein has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34743?usp=email )
Change subject: gsmtap_util: Use Osmo IO instead of Osmo write queues
......................................................................
Patch Set 8:
(1 comment)
File src/core/gsmtap_util.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34743/comment/f3aa93d6_8c2fdd5c
PS5, Line 478: osmo_iofd_setup(gti, gti->sink_fd, "gsmtap_inst.out",
OSMO_IO_FD_MODE_READ_WRITE, &gsmtap_sink_ops, NULL);
I agree, it probably make sense to […]
I have
restored pre-patch functionality for the sink in this patch and added
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34881 to simplify it.
It's WIP, because from what I could tell, the only project currently using a sink is
Osmocom-BB and that is running its own version of libosmocore anyways so I'm not sure
how to best test this quickly.
I could probably add a sink to osmo-mgw locally, and then manually send random packets to
the socket to see if the behavior changes (?)
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34743?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iadbbef74e3add7001d84dd6b68f51eac293e44d0
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34743
Gerrit-PatchSet: 8
Gerrit-Owner: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:07:18 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment