Attention is currently required from: pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change by fixeria. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/40994?usp=email )
Change subject: s1ap_proxy: remove eNB-ID from erab_uid()
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS3:
Did you think about making eNB-UE-S1AP-ID optional
when doing the lookup? This way you get a more ro […]
This will make the E-RAB
lookup more complicated for... what kind of robustness? When doing the lookup with partial
knowledge of the key (`erab_uid()`), you can no longer use `dict:find` or `dict:get`,
you'll have to convert the dictionary to a list and recursively check each item. This
is significantly slower.
The only scenario I could think of is the `PATCH SWITCH` procedure, when it's the eNB
establishing E-RAB (not the MME as usual). In that case the `PATH SWITCH REQUEST` contains
only the `eNB-UE-S1AP-ID` alone. We do not implement this procedure yet, and implementing
it would require quite a lot of additional changes.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/erlang/osmo-s1gw/+/40994?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: erlang/osmo-s1gw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I7277d19080795600252306dbfa0c733f996e026e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 40994
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2025 13:43:13 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>