Attention is currently required from: pespin. falconia has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32110 ) Change subject: common+trx: add rtp ecu-downstream vty option ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: (1 comment) Patchset: PS1: Correct. I think I see the source of confusion: the two words "downlink" and "downstream" both begin with the prefix "down", but they are two different English words, and in the present case have completely unrelated meanings. Think of upstream and downstream as in software developers, maintainers and distributors: the original developer's git repository is the ultimate upstream, tarball releases are downstream from that original repo, distro packages are further downstream, and so on. In the present case, I meant "downstream" as in "down the flow of this BTS-originated RTP stream", with the stream flowing through forwarders (OsmoMGW) and translators (themwi-mgw). I am agnostic on most naming questions, including this one. Harald, you already gave us the name for "rtp continuous-streaming" - maybe you could name this one for us too? -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/32110 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I0acca9c6d7da966a623287563e0789db9e0fae8e Gerrit-Change-Number: 32110 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:06:33 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: falconia <falcon(a)freecalypso.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment