Attention is currently required from: pespin. neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/36540?usp=email ) Change subject: nft_kpi: retrieve counters in a separate thread ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: (1 comment) Patchset: PS3: Responding to CR posted on an earlier patch: Your point seems to be that it_q is simpler than the implementation that is using mutexes. I considered this at length and decided against it. Reasons are code complexity as well as performance. Possibly the exact same reasons that osmo-trx has. This is a very generalised statement that seems to be an opinion, and not a hard fact. Let's stay here in this patch. There is a profound difference between blocking 3 ms, 30 ms, 300 ms or 3 s. 300 ms is too much for blocking all traffic on high volume infrastructure, but we do not know whether it is maybe closer to 3 ms yet. And blocking for 300 ms maybe once per day is not a problem that requires immediate action. There is also a difference between real-time phy code and a core network entity that is designed for high latency. IMHO your reasoning lacks these very important qualifications. A productive discussion could be based on "I do not agree with rarely blocking on HNBAP HNB Register events". My response to that is that we need empirical metrics to decide for or against it, and if it turns out bad, I will add the it_q. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/36540?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I9dc54e6bc94c553f45adfa71ae8ad70be4afbc8f Gerrit-Change-Number: 36540 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:40:36 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Gerrit-MessageType: comment