Hello Jenkins Builder,

I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/upf-benchmark/+/39890?usp=email

to look at the new patch set (#2).

The following approvals got outdated and were removed: Verified+1 by Jenkins Builder

Change subject: testsuites: upf: Support setting net iface irqs in c240 host ......................................................................

testsuites: upf: Support setting net iface irqs in c240 host

The Cisco C240 machines consist of 2 CPU packages, each with 20 cores (hyperthreading disabled). Those 2 CPUs packages are hence placed in 2 different NUMA zones.

By default, mlx5 driver creates one rx-queue per core, in this case it creates 40 rx-queues with 40 irqs (one for each rx-queue/core). This means it doesn't take into account the fact that the network card is plugged into a given PCIe bus belonging to one of the 2 available NUMA zones. As a result, when a packet is received and put into the rx-queue+irq belonging to the other NUMA zone, a penalty in memory-bandwitch is incurred, which ends up in a performance throughput penalty.

This commit is similar to 224e2dc3ab67311b4bad94bf891d1b5c5ca6128f applied to the tunmap scenario.

Change-Id: Ia4c006910e946e22ab375e9349940f1f756e7800 --- M testsuites/gtplab-sysmo2025/tunend/upf/eupf/configure.sh M testsuites/gtplab-sysmo2025/tunend/upf/osmo-upf/configure.sh 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/upf-benchmark refs/changes/90/39890/2