Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin.

neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31615 )

Change subject: VTY,CTRL: add 'osmodyn' as alias for 'tch/f_tch/h_sdcch8_pdch' ......................................................................

Patch Set 4:

(1 comment)

Patchset:

PS4:

OSMO/DYN? as in TCH/F

hmm I still prefer as little separators as possible here. For example, here:

https://gitea.osmocom.org/cellular-infrastructure/osmo-bsc/src/commit/b3de2e...

(this is test output from upcoming patch 'tweak gsm_pchan_ids[]: s/OSMO_DYN/OSMODYN' https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31632' )

pchan=SDCCH8+CBCH: ts->fi->id = 0-1-0-SDCCH8_CBCH lchan->fi->id = 0-1-0-SDCCH8_CBCH-0 assignment.fi->id = msc4294967295-conn123_subscr-TMSI-0x00000423_0-1-0-SDCCH8_CBCH-0 pchan=OSMODYN: ts->fi->id = 0-1-0-OSMODYN lchan->fi->id = 0-1-0-OSMODYN-0 assignment.fi->id = msc4294967295-conn123_subscr-TMSI-0x00000423_0-1-0-OSMODYNasNONE-0

In strings like these FSM instance IDs, 'OSMODYNasNONE' or usually more like 'OSMODYNasSDCCH8', the less separators the better IMHO.

just "dynamic" without "osmo"? "osmodyna" / "osmodynamic"? "FHSP"? "*" / "any"?

My favorite of all suggestions is still "osmodyn" -- it is short, clear enough and easy to remember. I'm happy to change it against my opinion if there is a clear consensus among reviewers...