Attention is currently required from: fixeria.

laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sccp/+/32185 )

Change subject: xua_rkm: handle_rkey_reg(): properly handle Routing Context IE ......................................................................

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)

Patchset:

PS1: I'm not sure if this will address the problem in general. AFAIR, the entire libosmo-sigtran codebase was written based on the assumption that routing context 0 means "no routing context IE is used".

Yes, in theory, an explicit routing context 0 IE is possible to use (as per spec), but I think it is a valid constraint to say we don't support routing context 0. So either the user wants to use the routing context IE on a given link (and then has to use a non-zero routing context), or they do not want to use a routing context at all (which we represent as routing context 0 internally).