Attention is currently required from: pespin.

laforge has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/40298?usp=email )

Change subject: sccp_scoc.c: assert value of sua_addr_parse() ......................................................................

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)

Patchset:

PS1: also, we have 13 instances of invoking sua_addr_parse without checking the return value, by far the majority of the calls. The function itself logs any error code paths. from what I can tell, I'd rather have a wrongly-routed message and that error log than a process crashing.