pespin has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/42128?usp=email )

Change subject: hnbgw: TC_rab_assign_mgcp_to: Allow hnbgw to tear down CN conn at SCCP level ......................................................................

hnbgw: TC_rab_assign_mgcp_to: Allow hnbgw to tear down CN conn at SCCP level

Newer versions of osmo-hnbgw will be tearing down the CN conn at SCCP level by transmitting an RLSD in this scenario, instead of sending a Iu RANAP Release Request crafted by the osmo-hnbgw itself. The HNBGW is expected to forward RANAP messages between UE/HNB and CN, not to generate them.

Related: SYS#7294 Change-Id: Idb062a072c7403442ce981c6c9caeb7effb86554 --- M hnbgw/HNBGW_Tests.ttcn 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Approvals: pespin: Looks good to me, approved fixeria: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve osmith: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve Jenkins Builder: Verified

diff --git a/hnbgw/HNBGW_Tests.ttcn b/hnbgw/HNBGW_Tests.ttcn index f679205..d27a26f 100644 --- a/hnbgw/HNBGW_Tests.ttcn +++ b/hnbgw/HNBGW_Tests.ttcn @@ -1230,13 +1230,16 @@ log("Ignoreing CRCX1", mgcp_cmd); repeat; } - [] RAN_CONN.receive(tr_RANAP_IuReleaseRequest(?)) { } + [] RAN_CONN.receive(tr_RANAP_IuReleaseRequest(?)) { + f_cn_iu_release_procedure(); + } + [] RAN_CONN.receive(tr_MSC_CONN_PRIM_DISC_IND) { + RUA.receive(RUA_Disc_Ind:?); + } [] T.timeout { setverdict(fail, "Timeout waiting for IuRelease"); } } - - f_cn_iu_release_procedure(); }

testcase TC_rab_assign_mgcp_to() runs on test_CT {